[BACK]Return to press.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Diff for /www/Attic/press.html between version 1.116 and 1.117

version 1.116, 2000/07/03 12:55:50 version 1.117, 2000/07/04 23:04:47
Line 54 
Line 54 
 <a href="ports.html">&quot;Ports&quot; collection</a>.  <a href="ports.html">&quot;Ports&quot; collection</a>.
 <p>  <p>
   
   <li><font color=#009000><strong><a
   href="http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2589471,00.html">Exposed
   to a Web of viruses</a>, eWeek.com, June 19, 2000
   </strong></font><br>
   
   Peter Coffee, eWeek Labs, mentions OpenBSD in an article subtitled
   "IT wanted integration; Microsoft delivered. Now both must fix lax
   security". Near the end (it's there, really), he writes:
   <i>Those who champion the open-source process point to projects
   such as the OpenBSD operating system, with its tremendous security
   record, as proof of concept. But there are other examples, such as
   loopholes in Kerberos code that went unnoticed for years, that show
   the limits of volunteer effort</i>. Once again, we note that published
   source code doesn't automatically imply a security review. It won't
   happen by itself: people have to <i>want</i> to do it.
   <p>
   
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a href="reprints/pr27.html">OpenBSD 2.7 press release</a>, June 15, 2000  <a href="reprints/pr27.html">OpenBSD 2.7 press release</a>, June 15, 2000
 </strong></font><br>  </strong></font><br>
Legend:
Removed from v.1.116  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.117