[BACK]Return to press.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Diff for /www/Attic/press.html between version 1.190 and 1.191

version 1.190, 2001/05/31 19:28:48 version 1.191, 2001/06/01 21:17:28
Line 32 
Line 32 
 <h2>May, 2001</h2>  <h2>May, 2001</h2>
   
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a href="http://securityportal.com/closet/closet20010405.html?&_ref=36874758">  
 Abandon hope all ye who enter here</a>  <a href="http://false.net/ipfilter/2001_05/0332.html">Re: IPFilter 3.4 update. </a>,
 Security Portal, April 05, 2001  Darren Reed, IPFilter mailing list archive, May 19, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://lwn.net/2001/0524/#ipfilter">BSD is not free software?</a>,
    LWN weekly news, May 24, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://www.bsdtoday.com/2001/May/News489.html">IP Filter License change?</a>,
   Jeremy C. Reed, BSD Today, May 24, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://www.deadly.org">Changes in IPFilter license to affect OpenBSD?</a>,
   Dengue, OpenBSD Journal, May 27, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://securityportal.com/articles/ipf20010528.html">IPF: Free no more?</a>,
   Kurt Seifried, Security Portal, May 28, 2001 <br>
   
   <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/28/1225224&mode=thread">IPF License Change: Redistribution Not Allowed</a>,
   Timothy, Slashdot, May 28, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/28/0610252&mode=thread">Changes in IPFilter License</a>,
   Hemos, Slashdot, May 28, 2001 <br>
   
   <a href="http://www.deadly.org">IPF removed from OpenBSD</a>,
   Dengue, OpenBSD Journal, May 30, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-05-30-001-20-NW-BD">IPFilter Comes Out of OpenBSD CVS</a>,
   Theo de Raadt, Linux Today, May 30, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6119988.html">Open-source spat spurs software change</a>,
   Stephen Shankland, CNET.com - Tech News, May 30, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://lwn.net/2001/0531/a/ipfilter-gone.php3">ipf (more)</a>,
   Theo de Raadt, LWN weekly news, May 31, 2001<br>
   
   <a href="http://lwn.net/2001/0601/">IP Filter licensing followup.</a>,
   LWN weekly news, Jun 01, 2001<br>
   
 </strong></font><br>  </strong></font><br>
   Many articles and discussions follow after Darren Reed clarified the license of his
   <a href="http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ip-filter.html">IP Filter</a> software.<br>
   Because IPF is not <a href="http://www.opensource.org">Open Source</a> and does not qualify for
   <a href="goals.html">OpenBSD licence rules</a>, IPF was removed from future release,
   and will be replaced with a free alternative.
   <p>
   
 Kurt Seifried interviews Elias Levy, a.k.a. Aleph1 from BugTraq, who  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 states that <em>&quot;efforts like the one from the OpenBSD project  <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5082320,00.html">
 <strong>are a must</strong>&quot;</em> and then goes further to say  Flaw found in common Internet standard</a>,
 that <em>&quot;systems that have gone through a source code security  ZDNet News, May 3, 2001
 audit should include a mandatory tag that says <strong>Lasciate ogne  </strong></font><br>
 speranza, voi ch'intrate</strong>&quot;</em>.<br>  Robert Lemos talks about the <a href="http://www.cert.org">CERT</a>
 Through the interview he also gives a very interesting note on other  <a href="http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-09.html">warning</a> concerning the Initial Sequence Numbers
 complex security models implemented to existing systems, and how  (ISN), which could be used to hijack TCP connections of several OS's, but not so
 incorrect implementation or configuration of such models results in  with OpenBSD.
 vulnerabilities.  Security through simplicity... doesn't this sound  
 familiar?  
 <p>  <p>
   
   
 <h2>April, 2001</h2>  <h2>April, 2001</h2>
   
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
Line 65 
Line 104 
 Windows 9x, ME and 2000, Solaris, Linux and the BSD family.<br>  Windows 9x, ME and 2000, Solaris, Linux and the BSD family.<br>
 Good scoring for OpenBSD, we're nearly safe up to 2.8, and  Good scoring for OpenBSD, we're nearly safe up to 2.8, and
 completely safe from 2.9 on.  completely safe from 2.9 on.
   <p>
   
   
   <li><font color=#009000><strong>
   <a href="http://securityportal.com/closet/closet20010405.html?&_ref=36874758">
   Abandon hope all ye who enter here</a>
   Security Portal, April 05, 2001
   </strong></font><br>
   
   Kurt Seifried interviews Elias Levy, a.k.a. Aleph1 from BugTraq, who
   states that <em>&quot;efforts like the one from the OpenBSD project
   <strong>are a must</strong>&quot;</em> and then goes further to say
   that <em>&quot;systems that have gone through a source code security
   audit should include a mandatory tag that says <strong>Lasciate ogne
   speranza, voi ch'intrate</strong>&quot;</em>.<br>
   Through the interview he also gives a very interesting note on other
   complex security models implemented to existing systems, and how
   incorrect implementation or configuration of such models results in
   vulnerabilities.  Security through simplicity... doesn't this sound
   familiar?
 <p>  <p>
   
 <h2>March, 2001</h2>  <h2>March, 2001</h2>
Legend:
Removed from v.1.190  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.191