===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.214
retrieving revision 1.215
diff -c -r1.214 -r1.215
*** www/Attic/press.html	2001/10/24 15:28:08	1.214
--- www/Attic/press.html	2001/10/24 19:23:21	1.215
***************
*** 31,50 ****
  <dl>
  
  <h2>October, 2001</h2>
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20011002/tc/how_code_red_revealed_the_perils_of_port_80_1.html">
  How Code Red revealed the perils of port 80</a>, ZDNet, October 2, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
! In an article about the effects and consequences of the Code Red worm which attacked
! Webservers running the IIS from Microsoft, the merits of reliability instead of new features
  are discussed. As a positive example they use OpenBSD.
! </li>
  
  <h2>July, 2001</h2>
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  An article on <a href="http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0701/openSSH.html">
  Sun's Solaris Blueprints Online series</a>
  </strong></font>
  talks about OpenSSH as a good replacement for telnet, rlogin, and friends.
  The article goes on to say:
  <br>&quot;OpenSSH is managed by the OpenBSD team. OpenBSD is an open
--- 31,96 ----
  <dl>
  
  <h2>October, 2001</h2>
+ 
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20011002/tc/how_code_red_revealed_the_perils_of_port_80_1.html">
  How Code Red revealed the perils of port 80</a>, ZDNet, October 2, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
! 
! In an article about the effects and consequences of the Code
! Red worm which attacked Webservers running the IIS from
! Microsoft, the merits of reliability instead of new features
  are discussed. As a positive example they use OpenBSD.
! <p>
  
+ <h2>August, 2001</h2>
+ 
+ <li><font color=#009000><strong>
+ <a href="http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=1232/urm0108m/">
+ Thinking about Security</a>, Unix Review, August 2001
+ </strong></font><br>
+ 
+ Following the Code Red worm hit of ISS, Joe &quot;Zonker&quot;
+ Brockmeier takes a tour through systems administration
+ security and says that even secured operating systems running
+ Apache like OpenBSD and others have security issues from time
+ to time.<br>
+ Oh well, we'll have to live with not having a total secure
+ system and just the most secure system.
+ <p>
+ 
+ <li><font color=#009000><strong>
+ <a href="http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1147/sam0108m/">
+ Homebrew Intrusion Detection Systems</a>, SysAdmin, August 2001
+ </strong></font><br>
+ 
+ Chris Kuethe goes one step ahead of installing network
+ intrusion detection systems and writes on how to make the
+ right environment for these tools and how to put them to work
+ instead, for which he takes OpenBSD as the platform of his
+ choice:<br>
+ <em>&quot;To the best of my knowledge (reproducible evidence
+ to the contrary is welcome) OpenBSD has the fastest IP stack
+ available (although all BSD-derived operating systems have
+ good network code) and an enviable security record. The
+ network monitor is unique in that it is often outside of any
+ network security devices and as such must be well
+ armored.&quot;</em><br>
+ For the references, he points out that <em>&quot;OpenBSD has
+ thorough documentation; almost everything you'll ever need to
+ know about making your analysis station be well behaved and
+ stable can be found in the man pages or the FAQ.&quot;</em>
+ <br>
+ Bravo!
+ <p>
+ 
  <h2>July, 2001</h2>
+ 
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  An article on <a href="http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0701/openSSH.html">
  Sun's Solaris Blueprints Online series</a>
  </strong></font>
+ 
  talks about OpenSSH as a good replacement for telnet, rlogin, and friends.
  The article goes on to say:
  <br>&quot;OpenSSH is managed by the OpenBSD team. OpenBSD is an open
***************
*** 52,58 ****
  free. A major goal of the OpenBSD project is to create a secure
  operating system by auditing source code, fixing security problems
  quickly, and integrating security tools and cryptographic software...&quot;
! </li>
  
  <h2>June, 2001</h2>
  
--- 98,104 ----
  free. A major goal of the OpenBSD project is to create a secure
  operating system by auditing source code, fixing security problems
  quickly, and integrating security tools and cryptographic software...&quot;
! <p>
  
  <h2>June, 2001</h2>
  
***************
*** 60,65 ****
--- 106,112 ----
  <a href="http://www.internetweek.com/reviews01/rev061801.htm">
  The OS X Files: Apple's updated operating system looks to the Internet</a>, InternetWeek, June 18, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  On a review of the Mac OS X, Larry Loeb adresses the question
  on how the change from Mac OS to Mac OS X will affect security
  by saying:<br> <em>"[...] the Unix layer is based on OpenBSD,
***************
*** 71,76 ****
--- 118,124 ----
  Strife and success in the land of open source</a>,
  ZDNet News, June 11, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  Stephan Somogyi reviews the latest issue with the IPF licence and
  examines why the OpenBSD team made the decision of removing it from
  its source tree altogether.  But <em>&quot;code talks, and OpenBSD has
***************
*** 90,95 ****
--- 138,144 ----
  Interview with Wietse Venema about his tcp_wrappers license</a>,
  BSD Today, June 1, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  Doing more research about licenses in the BSD tree, Jeremy C. Reed found that the license of
  the tcp_wrappers wasn't compliant with the BSD goals. The following interview with Wietse Venema
  caught the eye of Theo de Raadt, who had a lengthy and fun discussion about the license with Wietse.
***************
*** 175,180 ****
--- 224,230 ----
  Why Linux Will Never Be as Secure as OpenBSD,
  SecurityPortal, May 16, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  As a followup to his article one week before, titled 
  <!-- <a href="http://www.securityportal.com/closet/closet20010509.html"> -->"Why OpenBSD will never be as secure as Linux"
  , Kurt Seifried comes to the conclusion that clean and good programming is more important than dozens of features and
***************
*** 186,191 ****
--- 236,242 ----
  Flaw found in common Internet standard</a>,
  ZDNet News, May 3, 2001
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  Robert Lemos talks about the <a href="http://www.cert.org">CERT</a> 
  <a href="http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-09.html">warning</a> concerning the Initial Sequence Numbers
  (ISN), which could be used to hijack TCP connections of several OS's, but not so 
***************
*** 361,371 ****
  key members of the BSD movement at the recent USENIX Security Symposium 2000.
  <p>
  
- </li>
- 
  <h2>December, 2000</h2>
  
- 
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a
  href="http://eltoday.com/article.php3?ltsn=2000-12-26-001-13-PS">Florist.com
--- 412,419 ----
***************
*** 510,515 ****
--- 558,564 ----
  author concludes that the authors aren't paranoid enough in stripping down 
  the firewall system to the bare essentials.
  <p>
+ 
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a
  href="http://www.vnunet.com/Features/1113887">What the future holds for
***************
*** 527,532 ****
--- 576,582 ----
  <!-- <a href="http://www.sunworld.com/sunworldonline/swol-11-2000/swol-1110-silicon.html"> -->
  BSDCon 2000: A small, tasty conference, Sun World, November 2000
  </strong></font><br>
+ 
  Silicon Carny columnist Rich Morin reviews BSD Con 2000. He gives an overview
  of the five BSD variants available and a bit of atmosphere from the conference.
  <p>
***************
*** 1025,1032 ****
  <p>
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
! <a href="http://www.unixreview.com/open_source/articles/0006bsd.shtml">The
! state of the daemon</a>, UNIX Review, June 7, 2000
  </strong></font><br>
  
  Michael Lucas reviews the state of the art for BSD-derived systems,
--- 1075,1082 ----
  <p>
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
! <a href="http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=1247/urm0006c/">
! The state of the daemon</a>, UNIX Review, June 7, 2000
  </strong></font><br>
  
  Michael Lucas reviews the state of the art for BSD-derived systems,
***************
*** 1735,1742 ****
  <a href="http://www.gnupg.org/">GNU Privacy Guard</a> runs fine on OpenBSD.<p>
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
! <a href="http://www.samag.com/archive/0809/feature.shtml">Maintaining 
! Patch Levels with Open Source BSDs</a>, SysAdmin feature article, Sept. 1999
  </strong></font><br>
  
  Michael Lucas explains the broad lines of the BSD development model and
--- 1785,1792 ----
  <a href="http://www.gnupg.org/">GNU Privacy Guard</a> runs fine on OpenBSD.<p>
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
! <a href="http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1174/sam9909d/">
! Maintaining Patch Levels with Open Source BSDs</a>, SysAdmin feature article, Sept. 1999
  </strong></font><br>
  
  Michael Lucas explains the broad lines of the BSD development model and
***************
*** 2264,2270 ****
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
  <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.214 2001/10/24 15:28:08 horacio Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>
--- 2314,2320 ----
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
  <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.215 2001/10/24 19:23:21 horacio Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>