===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.382
retrieving revision 1.383
diff -c -r1.382 -r1.383
*** www/Attic/press.html	2004/03/23 18:19:33	1.382
--- www/Attic/press.html	2004/03/25 02:41:50	1.383
***************
*** 2265,2271 ****
  </strong></font><br>
  
  In this detailed review of the Sonnenreich &amp; Yates 
! <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/books.html">firewalls book</a>, the unnamed 
  author concludes that the authors aren't paranoid enough in stripping down 
  the firewall system to the bare essentials.
  <p>
--- 2265,2271 ----
  </strong></font><br>
  
  In this detailed review of the Sonnenreich &amp; Yates 
! <a href="books.html">firewalls book</a>, the unnamed 
  author concludes that the authors aren't paranoid enough in stripping down 
  the firewall system to the bare essentials.
  <p>
***************
*** 3354,3361 ****
  gives typical download times from the various national ISPs.<br>
  <i>Thanks to Vadim Vygonets, Wojciech Scigala and Tenyen for their help
  with the translation. For the full text, see the
! <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html">advocacy@openbsd.org
! mail archives</a>. Interpretation errors are mine --louis</i>
  <p>
  
  <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
--- 3354,3361 ----
  gives typical download times from the various national ISPs.<br>
  <i>Thanks to Vadim Vygonets, Wojciech Scigala and Tenyen for their help
  with the translation. For the full text, see the
! <a href="mail.html">advocacy@openbsd.org mail archives</a>. Interpretation
! errors are mine --louis</i>
  <p>
  
  <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
***************
*** 3406,3412 ****
  
  Vlad Sedach offers a detailed look at OpenBSD, its history, security stance
  and cryptography. He notes the lack of
! <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/smp.html">multiprocessor support</a>
  but rates the security as best available, especially compared to NT.
  <p>
  </ul>
--- 3406,3412 ----
  
  Vlad Sedach offers a detailed look at OpenBSD, its history, security stance
  and cryptography. He notes the lack of
! <a href="smp.html">multiprocessor support</a>
  but rates the security as best available, especially compared to NT.
  <p>
  </ul>
***************
*** 3895,3901 ****
  Security Watch: Monthly Editorial.</a> 
  July, 1998</strong></font><br>
  
! Points at our <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/security.html">security page</a>
  calling it "OpenBSD's mantra".
  <p>
  
--- 3895,3901 ----
  Security Watch: Monthly Editorial.</a> 
  July, 1998</strong></font><br>
  
! Points at our <a href="security.html">security page</a>
  calling it "OpenBSD's mantra".
  <p>
  
***************
*** 3941,3947 ****
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
  <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.382 2004/03/23 18:19:33 ian Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>
--- 3941,3947 ----
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
  <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.383 2004/03/25 02:41:50 jcs Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>