===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.557
retrieving revision 1.558
diff -c -r1.557 -r1.558
*** www/Attic/press.html	2007/02/19 18:57:21	1.557
--- www/Attic/press.html	2007/03/04 03:03:57	1.558
***************
*** 16,25 ****
--- 16,53 ----
  <h2><font color="#e00000">Media Coverage</font></h2>
  <hr>
  
+ 
  <h2>February, 2007</h2>
  <ul>
  
  <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
+ <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/security/is_symantecs_vista_security_assessment_credible.html">
+ Is Symantec's Vista Security Assessment Credible?</a>, Microsoft Watch, February 28, 2007
+ </strong></font><br>
+ This paper is nominally about the relationship between Symantec and Microsoft,
+ talking about a white paper released by the former.
+ But it's quite revealing about Microsoft itself.
+ "Even Microsoft... now acknowledges that UAC (User Account Control) - 
+ Vista's most [high-]profile security feature - is vulnerable to subversion, 
+ particularly through social-engineering tactics." 
+ And while the Symantec report says some good things about Vista security, 
+ "its criticisms are brutal - for their clarity and foreboding:
+ <blockquote>
+ "Many of the technologies that Microsoft has employed to bolster
+ the security of Windows Vista are not new. In fact, most are
+ derived from the groundwork originally laid by open-source
+ operating systems such as Linux and OpenBSD, the PaX and
+ Stackguard projects, as well as numerous academic publications....
+ The majority of these technologies first appeared in Windows
+ XP SP2 [Service Pack 2]. Windows XP SP2, at the time of its
+ release, was also billed as the most secure version of Windows."
+ </blockquote>
+ So remember, folks, if it's about security, you may well have heard it
+ here first, long before Microsoft "invented" it.
+ <p>
+ 
+ 
+ <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
  [GERMAN] <a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/85495">
  OpenBSD und Linux: Kritik an Stillhalteabkommen für Treiberentwicklung</a>, heise online, February 2, 2007
  </strong></font><br>
***************
*** 49,54 ****
--- 77,99 ----
  
  </ul>
   
+ <h2>January, 2007</h2>
+ <ul>
+ <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
+ <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/01/18/greylisting-with-pf.html">
+ Greylisting with PF</a>, O'Reilly onLAMP, January 18, 2007
+ </strong></font><br>
+ This onLAMP article by Dan Langille leads you through the process of
+ setting up greylisting using OpenBSSD's pf and spamd, which has now been ported
+ to most other BSD systems. The article is
+ quite detailed, but readers should ignore the FreeBSD-specific stuff 
+ like kldload (OpenBSD uses modload, but, OpenBSD always has pf built-in
+ so you don't need this). Parts of the article are based on Bob Beck's
+ <a href="http://www.nycbsdcon.org/speakers#Beck">spamd talk at NYCBSDCon</a>.
+ <p>
+ 
+ </ul>
+ 
  <h2>December, 2006</h2>
  <ul>
  
***************
*** 6032,6038 ****
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
  <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.557 2007/02/19 18:57:21 reyk Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>
--- 6077,6083 ----
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
  <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.558 2007/03/04 03:03:57 ian Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>