=================================================================== RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v retrieving revision 1.607 retrieving revision 1.608 diff -c -r1.607 -r1.608 *** www/Attic/press.html 2016/04/24 20:08:50 1.607 --- www/Attic/press.html 2016/08/15 02:22:11 1.608 *************** *** 6,12 **** ! --- 6,12 ---- ! *************** *** 464,470 **** Code written under NDA will make it difficult to improve it in the future because somebody signed an agreement to keep the required hardware documentation secret. For the OpenBSD project ! NDAs are never acceptable.

  • --- 464,470 ---- Code written under NDA will make it difficult to improve it in the future because somebody signed an agreement to keep the required hardware documentation secret. For the OpenBSD project ! NDAs are never acceptable.

  • *************** *** 807,813 **** support for UltraSPARC III on sparc64, improvements to ipsecctl, a new RCS implementation, and much more. Includes a reminder to "show your support for the project by ! placing your pre-orders today!"

    --- 807,813 ---- support for UltraSPARC III on sparc64, improvements to ipsecctl, a new RCS implementation, and much more. Includes a reminder to "show your support for the project by ! placing your pre-orders today!"

    *************** *** 1464,1470 **** fully dedicated to OpenBSD..." Great coverage of the OpenBSD Porting Hackathon: people, ports, beer, ... Contains a link to ! pval's summary slides.

    --- 1464,1470 ---- fully dedicated to OpenBSD..." Great coverage of the OpenBSD Porting Hackathon: people, ports, beer, ... Contains a link to ! pval's summary slides.

    *************** *** 3712,3718 **** making software vendors liable for bug-ridden products? Or rooting out insecure Microsoft products like the troubled SQL server in favor of more secure open-source solutions like ! OpenBSD?" I can scarcely believe that Slate's owner Microsoft is paying them to write this stuff (nor that Koerner thinks OpenBSD is a database :-)). Finally: "Nothing so bold is forthcoming in the Strategy. Which is --- 3712,3718 ---- making software vendors liable for bug-ridden products? Or rooting out insecure Microsoft products like the troubled SQL server in favor of more secure open-source solutions like ! OpenBSD?" I can scarcely believe that Slate's owner Microsoft is paying them to write this stuff (nor that Koerner thinks OpenBSD is a database :-)). Finally: "Nothing so bold is forthcoming in the Strategy. Which is *************** *** 3753,3759 **** Support, Software Development, Security, and Research. One unexpected result was the degree to which Security depends on FOSS. Banning FOSS would remove certain types of infrastructure components (e.g., ! OpenBSD) that currently help support network security. It would also limit DoD access to, and overall expertise in, the use of powerful FOSS analysis and detection applications that hostile groups could --- 3753,3759 ---- Support, Software Development, Security, and Research. One unexpected result was the degree to which Security depends on FOSS. Banning FOSS would remove certain types of infrastructure components (e.g., ! OpenBSD) that currently help support network security. It would also limit DoD access to, and overall expertise in, the use of powerful FOSS analysis and detection applications that hostile groups could