===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.82
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -c -r1.82 -r1.83
*** www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/17 12:47:11	1.82
--- www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/25 01:41:31	1.83
***************
*** 32,48 ****
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a
- href="http://www.securityfocus.com/commentary/19">Wide Open Source</a>,
- SecurityFocus.com, April 16, 2000
- </strong></font><br>
- 
- Elias Levy of BUGTRAQ fame discusses the security of open- vs. closed-source
- software. OpenBSD developers are mentioned first among a few groups of people
- who care about auditing code for security vulnerabilities.
- <p>
- 
- <li><font color=#009000><strong>
- <a
  href="http://e-zine.nluug.nl/hold.html?cid=91">Interview with OpenBSD's
  Theo de Raadt</a>, <font color=4669ad><sup>eup</sup></font> E-zine,
  April 20, 2000
--- 32,37 ----
***************
*** 55,60 ****
--- 44,75 ----
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a
+ href="http://securityportal.com/direct.cgi?/topnews/os20000417.html">Open
+ Source - Why it's Good for Security</a>, SecurityPortal.com, April 17, 2000
+ </strong></font><br>
+ 
+ In another FUD-fighting article, security writer Kurt Seifried and
+ Bastille Linux project leader Jay Beale refute a recent well-circulated
+ article saying open source software is more vulnerable because the
+ black hats can find bugs just by reading the source. If this were the
+ case, they argue, OpenBSD could not have achieved its security record.
+ They counter the claim by demolishing &quot;security through
+ obscurity&quot;, the myth that just won't go away.
+ <p>
+ 
+ <li><font color=#009000><strong>
+ <a
+ href="http://www.securityfocus.com/commentary/19">Wide Open Source</a>,
+ SecurityFocus.com, April 16, 2000
+ </strong></font><br>
+ 
+ Elias Levy of BUGTRAQ fame discusses the security of open- vs. closed-source
+ software. OpenBSD developers are mentioned first among a few groups of people
+ who care about auditing code for security vulnerabilities.
+ <p>
+ 
+ <li><font color=#009000><strong>
+ <a
  href="http://www.32bitsonline.com/article.php3?file=issues/200004/badpressedit">
  Bad Press</a>, 
  32Bits Online, April 2000
***************
*** 159,164 ****
--- 174,193 ----
  
  <li><font color=#009000><strong>
  <a
+ href="http://www.32bitsonline.com/article.php3?file=issues/200002/fbsd34&page=1">Review
+ of FreeBSD 3.4</a>, 32BitsOnline, February 2000
+ </strong></font><br>
+ 
+ In a review of FreeBSD 3.4, the author, Clifford Smith, was impressed
+ enough about OpenBSD to say &quot;<i>OpenBSD is probably the most secure
+ distribution out of the box because it comes with a source code that has
+ been given a complete security audit. It also comes with KERBEROS enabled
+ out of the chute, OpenSSL and ssh is part of the distro now, too. IPFilter
+ works immediately. Just Brilliant.&quot;</i>
+ <p>
+ 
+ <li><font color=#009000><strong>
+ <a
  href="http://www.infosecuritymag.com/feb2000/Linux.htm">Securing Linux</a>,
  Information Security, February 2000
  </strong></font><br>
***************
*** 854,860 ****
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
  <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.82 2000/04/17 12:47:11 aaron Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>
--- 883,889 ----
  <hr>
  <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
  <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
! <br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.83 2000/04/25 01:41:31 louis Exp $</small>
  
  </body>
  </html>