===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.411
retrieving revision 1.412
diff -u -r1.411 -r1.412
--- www/Attic/press.html	2004/10/18 01:26:54	1.411
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2004/10/20 14:24:06	1.412
@@ -19,6 +19,28 @@
 <h2>October, 2004</h2>
 <ul>
 <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
+<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/18/1097951615940.html">
+Which platform will save you from the nasties?</a>,
+The Age, October 19, 2004</strong></font><br>
+Starts with the question:
+<blockquote>
+"... which is more secure - Windows or Linux?
+<br/>
+A snide answer is OpenBSD, which has an exemplary record with respect to 
+security. But let's stick to the two most broadly used platforms in IT today.
+<br/>
+Microsoft's hired analysts claim that Windows is more secure than Linux.
+Should we believe them?"
+</blockquote>
+Not surprisingly, the answer is in the negative. 
+Good discussion on why Microsoft's OS is still not really secure.
+Ends with the conclusion that, if you must use MS-Windows, do so,
+but have another computer running an OS "which has a lower-risk profile"
+for your mail, web and other online activities.
+That could be OpenBSD (registration required).
+<p>
+
+<li><font color="#009000"><strong>
 <a href="http://www.onlypunjab.com/fullstory904-insight-Simple+Simon-status-25-newsID-5131.html">
 Simple Simon</a>,
 Only Punjab Business News, October 17, 2004</strong></font><br>
@@ -4293,7 +4315,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
 <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.411 2004/10/18 01:26:54 nick Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.412 2004/10/20 14:24:06 ian Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>