===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.557
retrieving revision 1.558
diff -u -r1.557 -r1.558
--- www/Attic/press.html	2007/02/19 18:57:21	1.557
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2007/03/04 03:03:57	1.558
@@ -16,10 +16,38 @@
 <h2><font color="#e00000">Media Coverage</font></h2>
 <hr>
 
+
 <h2>February, 2007</h2>
 <ul>
 
 <li><font color="#009000"><strong>
+<a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/security/is_symantecs_vista_security_assessment_credible.html">
+Is Symantec's Vista Security Assessment Credible?</a>, Microsoft Watch, February 28, 2007
+</strong></font><br>
+This paper is nominally about the relationship between Symantec and Microsoft,
+talking about a white paper released by the former.
+But it's quite revealing about Microsoft itself.
+"Even Microsoft... now acknowledges that UAC (User Account Control) - 
+Vista's most [high-]profile security feature - is vulnerable to subversion, 
+particularly through social-engineering tactics." 
+And while the Symantec report says some good things about Vista security, 
+"its criticisms are brutal - for their clarity and foreboding:
+<blockquote>
+"Many of the technologies that Microsoft has employed to bolster
+the security of Windows Vista are not new. In fact, most are
+derived from the groundwork originally laid by open-source
+operating systems such as Linux and OpenBSD, the PaX and
+Stackguard projects, as well as numerous academic publications....
+The majority of these technologies first appeared in Windows
+XP SP2 [Service Pack 2]. Windows XP SP2, at the time of its
+release, was also billed as the most secure version of Windows."
+</blockquote>
+So remember, folks, if it's about security, you may well have heard it
+here first, long before Microsoft "invented" it.
+<p>
+
+
+<li><font color="#009000"><strong>
 [GERMAN] <a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/85495">
 OpenBSD und Linux: Kritik an Stillhalteabkommen für Treiberentwicklung</a>, heise online, February 2, 2007
 </strong></font><br>
@@ -49,6 +77,23 @@
 
 </ul>
  
+<h2>January, 2007</h2>
+<ul>
+<li><font color="#009000"><strong>
+<a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/01/18/greylisting-with-pf.html">
+Greylisting with PF</a>, O'Reilly onLAMP, January 18, 2007
+</strong></font><br>
+This onLAMP article by Dan Langille leads you through the process of
+setting up greylisting using OpenBSSD's pf and spamd, which has now been ported
+to most other BSD systems. The article is
+quite detailed, but readers should ignore the FreeBSD-specific stuff 
+like kldload (OpenBSD uses modload, but, OpenBSD always has pf built-in
+so you don't need this). Parts of the article are based on Bob Beck's
+<a href="http://www.nycbsdcon.org/speakers#Beck">spamd talk at NYCBSDCon</a>.
+<p>
+
+</ul>
+
 <h2>December, 2006</h2>
 <ul>
 
@@ -6032,7 +6077,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
 <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.557 2007/02/19 18:57:21 reyk Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.558 2007/03/04 03:03:57 ian Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>