===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.77
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -r1.77 -r1.78
--- www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/06 16:55:44	1.77
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/06 16:58:44	1.78
@@ -28,17 +28,10 @@
 <h3><font color=#e00000>English press coverage</font></h3><p>
 <dl>
 
-<h2>March, 2000</h2>
+<h2>April, 2000</h2>
 
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
-href="http://securityportal.com/closet/closet20000329.html">Linux
-is a security risk, I don't think so!</a>, 
-Security Portal, March 29, 2000
-</strong></font><br>
-
-<li><font color=#009000><strong>
-<a
 href="http://www.32bitsonline.com/article.php3?file=issues/200004/badpressedit">
 Bad Press</a>, 
 32Bits Online, April 2000
@@ -51,8 +44,23 @@
 is that proof."</b> (his emphasis)
 <p>
 
+<h2>March, 2000</h2>
+
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
+href="http://securityportal.com/closet/closet20000329.html">Linux
+is a security risk, I don't think so!</a>, 
+Security Portal, March 29, 2000
+</strong></font><br>
+
+Columnist Kurt Seifried uses OpenBSD's code audit as an example to
+refute a FUD piece on a major computer industry website that claims
+that Linux is a security risk because the bad guys can find the holes
+simply by reading the source code.
+<p>
+
+<li><font color=#009000><strong>
+<a
 href="http://boardwatch.internet.com/mag/2000/mar/bwm79.html">Getting
 to know OpenBSD</a>, Boardwatch Magazine, March 2000
 </strong></font><br>
@@ -810,7 +818,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.77 2000/04/06 16:55:44 deraadt Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.78 2000/04/06 16:58:44 deraadt Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>