===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.82
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -r1.82 -r1.83
--- www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/17 12:47:11	1.82
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2000/04/25 01:41:31	1.83
@@ -32,17 +32,6 @@
 
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
-href="http://www.securityfocus.com/commentary/19">Wide Open Source</a>,
-SecurityFocus.com, April 16, 2000
-</strong></font><br>
-
-Elias Levy of BUGTRAQ fame discusses the security of open- vs. closed-source
-software. OpenBSD developers are mentioned first among a few groups of people
-who care about auditing code for security vulnerabilities.
-<p>
-
-<li><font color=#009000><strong>
-<a
 href="http://e-zine.nluug.nl/hold.html?cid=91">Interview with OpenBSD's
 Theo de Raadt</a>, <font color=4669ad><sup>eup</sup></font> E-zine,
 April 20, 2000
@@ -55,6 +44,32 @@
 
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
+href="http://securityportal.com/direct.cgi?/topnews/os20000417.html">Open
+Source - Why it's Good for Security</a>, SecurityPortal.com, April 17, 2000
+</strong></font><br>
+
+In another FUD-fighting article, security writer Kurt Seifried and
+Bastille Linux project leader Jay Beale refute a recent well-circulated
+article saying open source software is more vulnerable because the
+black hats can find bugs just by reading the source. If this were the
+case, they argue, OpenBSD could not have achieved its security record.
+They counter the claim by demolishing &quot;security through
+obscurity&quot;, the myth that just won't go away.
+<p>
+
+<li><font color=#009000><strong>
+<a
+href="http://www.securityfocus.com/commentary/19">Wide Open Source</a>,
+SecurityFocus.com, April 16, 2000
+</strong></font><br>
+
+Elias Levy of BUGTRAQ fame discusses the security of open- vs. closed-source
+software. OpenBSD developers are mentioned first among a few groups of people
+who care about auditing code for security vulnerabilities.
+<p>
+
+<li><font color=#009000><strong>
+<a
 href="http://www.32bitsonline.com/article.php3?file=issues/200004/badpressedit">
 Bad Press</a>, 
 32Bits Online, April 2000
@@ -159,6 +174,20 @@
 
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
+href="http://www.32bitsonline.com/article.php3?file=issues/200002/fbsd34&page=1">Review
+of FreeBSD 3.4</a>, 32BitsOnline, February 2000
+</strong></font><br>
+
+In a review of FreeBSD 3.4, the author, Clifford Smith, was impressed
+enough about OpenBSD to say &quot;<i>OpenBSD is probably the most secure
+distribution out of the box because it comes with a source code that has
+been given a complete security audit. It also comes with KERBEROS enabled
+out of the chute, OpenSSL and ssh is part of the distro now, too. IPFilter
+works immediately. Just Brilliant.&quot;</i>
+<p>
+
+<li><font color=#009000><strong>
+<a
 href="http://www.infosecuritymag.com/feb2000/Linux.htm">Securing Linux</a>,
 Information Security, February 2000
 </strong></font><br>
@@ -854,7 +883,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.82 2000/04/17 12:47:11 aaron Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.83 2000/04/25 01:41:31 louis Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>