[BACK]Return to press.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Diff for /www/Attic/press.html between version 1.220 and 1.221

version 1.220, 2001/11/07 23:12:08 version 1.221, 2001/11/08 11:25:04
Line 5 
Line 5 
 <link rev=made href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>  <link rev=made href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>
 <meta name="resource-type" content="document">  <meta name="resource-type" content="document">
 <meta name="distribution" content="global">  <meta name="distribution" content="global">
 <meta name="copyright" content="This document copyright 1996-2000 by OpenBSD.">  <meta name="copyright" content="This document copyright 1996-2001 by OpenBSD.">
 </head>  </head>
   
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#23238E">  <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#23238E">
Line 54 
Line 54 
 quoting him saying <em>&quot;security is usually increased by  quoting him saying <em>&quot;security is usually increased by
 removing stuff, not by adding more junk&quot;</em> in that  removing stuff, not by adding more junk&quot;</em> in that
 it's easier to keep something simple secure.  it's easier to keep something simple secure.
   <p>
   
   <li><font color=#009000><strong>
   <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/articles/tc/xml/01/11/05/011105tcbsd.xml">
   BSD's strength lies in devilish details</a>, InfoWorld November 2, 2001
   </strong></font><br>
   
   By Tom Yager.  In a comparison of the BSD-derived systems with
   those based in the Linux kernel, the author underlines the
   stability and security strengths of the BSDs.  He brands
   OpenBSD as the <em>cop</em> of the group, remarking the fact
   that <em>&quot;has never been breached to allow privileged
   access to an OpenBSD server&quot;</em>.
 <p>  <p>
   
 <h2>October, 2001</h2>  <h2>October, 2001</h2>
Legend:
Removed from v.1.220  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.221