version 1.543, 2006/10/13 16:43:00 |
version 1.544, 2006/10/14 03:01:53 |
|
|
<p> |
<p> |
|
|
<li><font color="#009000"><strong> |
<li><font color="#009000"><strong> |
|
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/11/olpc-under-fire-for-proprietary-components/"> |
|
OLPC under fire for proprietary components</a>, Engadget, October 11, 2006 |
|
</strong></font><br> |
|
Hardware site Engadget is one of several that has picked up this controversy |
|
from the Jem Report quoted below and on the mailing lists. |
|
Quotes Theo's reaction to Jim Gettys' latest comments: |
|
"Jim is obviously very clever at convincing people that children |
|
need proprietary laptops (OLPC has a greater percentage of undocumented |
|
hardware than a Thinkpad from 3 years ago). It is easy for Jim to |
|
convince people these things because he doesn't care at all about |
|
the future maintainance of drivers. I do. And I think most of you |
|
also do." |
|
The article ends with: "Wow, them be fightin' words -- we're pulling up ringside |
|
seats already." |
|
<p> |
|
|
|
<li><font color="#009000"><strong> |
|
<a href="http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/"> |
|
Making sense of the One Laptop Per Child proprietary software row</a>, |
|
The Jem Report, October 9, 2006 |
|
</strong></font><br> |
|
Jem Matzan explores this ongoing controversy by blending separate interviews with |
|
Jim Gettys, Richard Stallman and our own Theo de Raadt. |
|
Theo consistently and clearly defends the project's interest in |
|
getting documentation on, and permission to distribute, firmware |
|
so that users can use hardware they have paid for. |
|
Commenting on the multiple NDA-requiring parts in the current version of |
|
the OLPC laptop, Theo notes that "If I am careful in selection, |
|
I can buy a laptop on the market today that has fewer proprietary parts." |
|
And on the OLPC project's use of NDA-requiring parts at all: |
|
"I feel they have misled the community by acting as if they are open; |
|
they rode on our coat-tails. Now it turns out they are going to ship GPL'd |
|
code mixed with NDA-requiring proprietary drivers in the end. |
|
Even their LinuxBIOS will need to link into drivers that |
|
no one can repair because the documentation is locked up..." |
|
<p> |
|
|
|
<li><font color="#009000"><strong> |
<a href="http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20061006000709"> |
<a href="http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20061006000709"> |
OLPC hurts wireless documentation efforts</a>, undeadly.org, October 6, 2006 |
OLPC hurts wireless documentation efforts</a>, undeadly.org, October 6, 2006 |
</strong></font><br> |
</strong></font><br> |