===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.204
retrieving revision 1.205
diff -u -r1.204 -r1.205
--- www/Attic/press.html	2001/08/09 07:31:22	1.204
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2001/09/04 20:51:51	1.205
@@ -1816,21 +1816,7 @@
 
 <h2>February, 1999</h2>
 
-<a name=anzen1></a>
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
-<a href="http://www.anzen.com/research/research_perform.html">
-NFR Performance Testing</a>, report written by
-<a href="http://www.anzen.com">Anzen</a>. February, 1999</strong></font><br>
-
-This report compares the network monitoring performance of the
-<a href="http://www.nfr.net">NFR (Network Flight Recorder)</a> package at
-handling flat-out 100Mbit ethernet monitoring, running on OpenBSD, BSDI,
-Linux, and Solaris.  OpenBSD comes out as a clear winner just for raw
-performance; even before you consider the superior security of OpenBSD
-which you probably would want for a network-monitoring station.
-<p>
-
-<li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a href="http://www.daemonnews.org/199902/samba.html">
 DaemonNews: Serving NT filesystems from an OpenBSD server</a> 
 February, 1999</strong></font><br>
@@ -2212,7 +2198,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.204 2001/08/09 07:31:22 pvalchev Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.205 2001/09/04 20:51:51 brad Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>