===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/Attic/press.html,v
retrieving revision 1.205
retrieving revision 1.206
diff -u -r1.205 -r1.206
--- www/Attic/press.html	2001/09/04 20:51:51	1.205
+++ www/Attic/press.html	2001/09/10 18:34:06	1.206
@@ -38,11 +38,11 @@
 ZDNet News, June 11, 2001
 </strong></font><br>
 Stephan Somogyi reviews the latest issue with the IPF licence and
-examines why the OpenBSD team made the decission of removing it from
+examines why the OpenBSD team made the decision of removing it from
 its source tree altogether.  But <em>&quot;code talks, and OpenBSD has
 spoken quite eloquently in the past&quot;</em>, writes Somogyi.  Later
 on the article he comments on the team's <em>licence audit</em> through
-the OpenBSD source code and Wietse Venema's decission to change his
+the OpenBSD source code and Wietse Venema's decision to change his
 tcp_wrappers' licence after a talk with Theo de Raadt.
 <br>
 To make up for the stormy issue that IPF's licence has meant for the
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a href="http://www.bsdtoday.com/2001/June/Features496.html">
 Interview with Wietse Venema about his tcp_wrappers license</a>,
-BSD Today, June 01, 2001
+BSD Today, June 1, 2001
 </strong></font><br>
 Doing more research about licenses in the BSD tree, Jeremy C. Reed found that the license of
 the tcp_wrappers wasn't compliant with the BSD goals. The following interview with Wietse Venema
@@ -104,15 +104,15 @@
 Theo de Raadt, LWN weekly news, May 31, 2001<br>
 
 <a href="http://lwn.net/2001/0601/">IP Filter licensing followup.</a>,
-LWN weekly news, Jun 01, 2001<br>
+LWN weekly news, June 1, 2001<br>
 
 <a href="http://www.bsdtoday.com/2001/June/Features495.html">
 BSD project goals, IP Filter licensing, and Darren Reed interview</a>,
-Jeremy C. Reed, BSD Today, Jun 01, 2001<br>
+Jeremy C. Reed, BSD Today, June 1, 2001<br>
 
 <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO61038,00.html">
 OpenBSD drops firewall program in licensing dispute</a>,
-Todd R. Weiss, ComputerWorld, June 01, 2001<br>
+Todd R. Weiss, ComputerWorld, June 1, 2001<br>
 
 <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/03/1911246&mode=thread">Changes in IPFilter License</a>,
 Hemos, Slashdot, June 3, 2001<br>
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
 
 <li><font color=#009000><strong>
 <a
-href="http://www.ddj.com/articles/2001/0165/0165a/0165a.htm">Theo deRaadt,
+href="http://www.ddj.com/articles/2001/0165/0165a/0165a.htm">Theo de Raadt,
 Todd Miller, Angelos Keromytis, Werner Losh, and Jack Woehr
 at "A Roundtable on BSD, Security, and Quality"</a>, Dr. Dobb's, January, 2001
 </strong></font><br>
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
 
 Stephan Somogyi explains why he runs OpenBSD, largely due to OpenBSD's
 emphasis on security.  Some might argue that his example security flaw,
-open spam relays, is really no big deal, but we think it raises an
+open SPAM relays, is really no big deal, but we think it raises an
 important point: if an OS or mail system ships with relaying open by default,
 what message does that send about that system's resistance to less trivial
 attacks.  He also chides Intel and 3Com for not providing driver
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a> 
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.205 2001/09/04 20:51:51 brad Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: press.html,v 1.206 2001/09/10 18:34:06 ian Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>