===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/errata31.html,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -c -r1.81 -r1.82
*** www/errata31.html 2017/03/28 04:04:52 1.81
--- www/errata31.html 2017/03/28 06:41:18 1.82
***************
*** 86,92 ****
027: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 86,92 ----
027: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 121,127 ****
023: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
--- 121,127 ----
023: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
***************
*** 131,137 ****
022: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 131,137 ----
022: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 140,146 ****
021: SECURITY FIX: February 23, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
--- 140,146 ----
021: SECURITY FIX: February 23, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
***************
*** 150,156 ****
020: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
--- 150,156 ----
020: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
***************
*** 163,169 ****
019: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
--- 163,169 ----
019: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
***************
*** 174,180 ****
018: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Incorrect argument checking in the
! getrlimit(2)
system call may allow an attacker to crash the kernel.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 174,180 ----
018: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Incorrect argument checking in the
! getrlimit(2)
system call may allow an attacker to crash the kernel.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 183,189 ****
017: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 183,189 ----
017: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 192,198 ****
016: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 192,198 ----
016: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 201,207 ****
015: SECURITY FIX: October 2, 2002
All architectures
Incorrect argument checking in the
! setitimer(2) system call may allow an attacker to write to kernel memory.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 201,207 ----
015: SECURITY FIX: October 2, 2002
All architectures
Incorrect argument checking in the
! setitimer(2) system call may allow an attacker to write to kernel memory.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 209,215 ****
014: SECURITY FIX: August 11, 2002
All architectures
An insufficient boundary check in the
! select(2)
system call allows an attacker to overwrite kernel memory and execute arbitrary
code in kernel context.
--- 209,215 ----
014: SECURITY FIX: August 11, 2002
All architectures
An insufficient boundary check in the
! select(2)
system call allows an attacker to overwrite kernel memory and execute arbitrary
code in kernel context.
***************
*** 219,227 ****
013: SECURITY FIX: July 30, 2002
All architectures
Several remote buffer overflows can occur in the SSL2 server and SSL3 client of the
! ssl(8)
library, as in the ASN.1 parser code in the
! crypto(3)
library, all of them being potentially remotely exploitable.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 219,227 ----
013: SECURITY FIX: July 30, 2002
All architectures
Several remote buffer overflows can occur in the SSL2 server and SSL3 client of the
! ssl(8)
library, as in the ASN.1 parser code in the
! crypto(3)
library, all of them being potentially remotely exploitable.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 232,238 ****
012: SECURITY FIX: July 29, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! xdr_array(3)
RPC code, leading to possible remote crash.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 232,238 ----
012: SECURITY FIX: July 29, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! xdr_array(3)
RPC code, leading to possible remote crash.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 243,249 ****
011: SECURITY FIX: July 29, 2002
All architectures
A race condition exists in the
! pppd(8)
daemon which may cause it to alter the file permissions of an arbitrary file.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 243,249 ----
011: SECURITY FIX: July 29, 2002
All architectures
A race condition exists in the
! pppd(8)
daemon which may cause it to alter the file permissions of an arbitrary file.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 252,258 ****
010: RELIABILITY FIX: July 5, 2002
All architectures
Receiving IKE payloads out of sequence can cause
! isakmpd(8) to crash.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 252,258 ----
010: RELIABILITY FIX: July 5, 2002
All architectures
Receiving IKE payloads out of sequence can cause
! isakmpd(8) to crash.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 261,267 ****
--- 261,267 ----
***************
*** 302,308 ****
All architectures
Under certain conditions, on systems using YP with netgroups in the
password database, it is possible that
! sshd(8)
does ACL checks for the requested user name but uses the password
database entry of a different user for authentication. This means
that denied users might authenticate successfully while permitted
--- 302,308 ----
All architectures
Under certain conditions, on systems using YP with netgroups in the
password database, it is possible that
! sshd(8)
does ACL checks for the requested user name but uses the password
database entry of a different user for authentication. This means
that denied users might authenticate successfully while permitted
***************
*** 322,328 ****
--- 322,328 ----
***************
*** 330,336 ****
001: SECURITY FIX: April 22, 2002
All architectures
A local user can gain super-user privileges due to a buffer overflow
! in sshd(8)
if AFS has been configured on the system or if
KerberosTgtPassing or AFSTokenPassing has been enabled
in the sshd_config file. Ticket and token passing is not enabled
--- 330,336 ----
001: SECURITY FIX: April 22, 2002
All architectures
A local user can gain super-user privileges due to a buffer overflow
! in sshd(8)
if AFS has been configured on the system or if
KerberosTgtPassing or AFSTokenPassing has been enabled
in the sshd_config file. Ticket and token passing is not enabled