===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/errata32.html,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -c -r1.58 -r1.59
*** www/errata32.html 2016/03/21 05:46:20 1.58
--- www/errata32.html 2016/03/22 10:54:42 1.59
***************
*** 96,102 ****
All architectures
The use of certain ASN.1 encodings or malformed public keys may allow an
attacker to mount a denial of service attack against applications linked with
! ssl(3).
This does not affect OpenSSH.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 96,102 ----
All architectures
The use of certain ASN.1 encodings or malformed public keys may allow an
attacker to mount a denial of service attack against applications linked with
! ssl(3).
This does not affect OpenSSH.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 105,111 ****
019: SECURITY FIX: September 24, 2003
All architectures
Three cases of potential access to freed memory have been found in
! pf(4).
At least one of them could be used to panic pf with active scrub rules remotely.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 105,111 ----
019: SECURITY FIX: September 24, 2003
All architectures
Three cases of potential access to freed memory have been found in
! pf(4).
At least one of them could be used to panic pf with active scrub rules remotely.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 114,120 ****
018: SECURITY FIX: September 17, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 114,120 ----
018: SECURITY FIX: September 17, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 134,145 ****
016: SECURITY FIX: August 25, 2003
All architectures
Fix for a potential security issue in
! sendmail(8)
with respect to DNS maps. This only affects
! sendmail(8)
configurations that use the "enhdnsbl"
feature. The default OpenBSD
! sendmail(8)
config does not use this.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 134,145 ----
016: SECURITY FIX: August 25, 2003
All architectures
Fix for a potential security issue in
! sendmail(8)
with respect to DNS maps. This only affects
! sendmail(8)
configurations that use the "enhdnsbl"
feature. The default OpenBSD
! sendmail(8)
config does not use this.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 148,154 ****
015: SECURITY FIX: August 4, 2003
All architectures
An off-by-one error exists in the C library function
! realpath(3).
Since this same bug resulted in a root compromise in the wu-ftpd ftp server
it is possible that this bug may allow an attacker to gain escalated privileges
on OpenBSD.
--- 148,154 ----
015: SECURITY FIX: August 4, 2003
All architectures
An off-by-one error exists in the C library function
! realpath(3).
Since this same bug resulted in a root compromise in the wu-ftpd ftp server
it is possible that this bug may allow an attacker to gain escalated privileges
on OpenBSD.
***************
*** 159,165 ****
014: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 159,165 ----
014: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 194,203 ****
010: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
For OpenBSD 3.2 the impact is limited since
! lprm(1)
is setuid daemon, not setuid root.
--- 194,203 ----
010: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
For OpenBSD 3.2 the impact is limited since
! lprm(1)
is setuid daemon, not setuid root.
***************
*** 207,213 ****
009: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 207,213 ----
009: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 215,221 ****
--- 215,221 ----
***************
*** 223,229 ****
007: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
A
--- 223,229 ----
007: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
A
***************
*** 233,239 ****
006: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
--- 233,239 ----
006: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
***************
*** 246,252 ****
005: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
--- 246,252 ----
005: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
***************
*** 257,263 ****
004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
A logic error in the
! pool
kernel memory allocator could cause memory corruption in low-memory situations,
causing the system to crash.
--- 257,263 ----
004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
A logic error in the
! pool
kernel memory allocator could cause memory corruption in low-memory situations,
causing the system to crash.
***************
*** 267,273 ****
003: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 267,273 ----
003: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 276,284 ****
002: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Network
! bridges
running
! pf
with scrubbing enabled could cause mbuf corruption,
causing the system to crash.
--- 276,284 ----
002: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Network
! bridges
running
! pf
with scrubbing enabled could cause mbuf corruption,
causing the system to crash.
***************
*** 288,294 ****
001: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 288,294 ----
001: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.