===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/errata32.html,v
retrieving revision 1.67
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -c -r1.67 -r1.68
*** www/errata32.html 2017/03/28 04:04:52 1.67
--- www/errata32.html 2017/03/28 06:41:18 1.68
***************
*** 95,101 ****
All architectures
The use of certain ASN.1 encodings or malformed public keys may allow an
attacker to mount a denial of service attack against applications linked with
! ssl(3).
This does not affect OpenSSH.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 95,101 ----
All architectures
The use of certain ASN.1 encodings or malformed public keys may allow an
attacker to mount a denial of service attack against applications linked with
! ssl(3).
This does not affect OpenSSH.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 104,110 ****
019: SECURITY FIX: September 24, 2003
All architectures
Three cases of potential access to freed memory have been found in
! pf(4).
At least one of them could be used to panic pf with active scrub rules remotely.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 104,110 ----
019: SECURITY FIX: September 24, 2003
All architectures
Three cases of potential access to freed memory have been found in
! pf(4).
At least one of them could be used to panic pf with active scrub rules remotely.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 113,119 ****
018: SECURITY FIX: September 17, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 113,119 ----
018: SECURITY FIX: September 17, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 133,144 ****
016: SECURITY FIX: August 25, 2003
All architectures
Fix for a potential security issue in
! sendmail(8)
with respect to DNS maps. This only affects
! sendmail(8)
configurations that use the "enhdnsbl"
feature. The default OpenBSD
! sendmail(8)
config does not use this.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 133,144 ----
016: SECURITY FIX: August 25, 2003
All architectures
Fix for a potential security issue in
! sendmail(8)
with respect to DNS maps. This only affects
! sendmail(8)
configurations that use the "enhdnsbl"
feature. The default OpenBSD
! sendmail(8)
config does not use this.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 147,153 ****
015: SECURITY FIX: August 4, 2003
All architectures
An off-by-one error exists in the C library function
! realpath(3).
Since this same bug resulted in a root compromise in the wu-ftpd ftp server
it is possible that this bug may allow an attacker to gain escalated privileges
on OpenBSD.
--- 147,153 ----
015: SECURITY FIX: August 4, 2003
All architectures
An off-by-one error exists in the C library function
! realpath(3).
Since this same bug resulted in a root compromise in the wu-ftpd ftp server
it is possible that this bug may allow an attacker to gain escalated privileges
on OpenBSD.
***************
*** 158,164 ****
014: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 158,164 ----
014: SECURITY FIX: March 31, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the address parsing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 193,202 ****
010: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
For OpenBSD 3.2 the impact is limited since
! lprm(1)
is setuid daemon, not setuid root.
--- 193,202 ----
010: SECURITY FIX: March 5, 2003
All architectures
A fix for an
! lprm(1)
bug made in 1996 contains an error that could lead to privilege escalation.
For OpenBSD 3.2 the impact is limited since
! lprm(1)
is setuid daemon, not setuid root.
***************
*** 206,212 ****
009: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 206,212 ----
009: SECURITY FIX: March 3, 2003
All architectures
A buffer overflow in the envelope comments processing in
! sendmail(8)
may allow an attacker to gain root privileges.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 214,220 ****
--- 214,220 ----
***************
*** 222,228 ****
007: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
A
--- 222,228 ----
007: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2003
All architectures
In
! ssl(8) an information leak can occur via timing by performing a MAC computation
even if incorrect block cipher padding has been found, this is a
countermeasure. Also, check for negative sizes in memory allocation routines.
A
***************
*** 232,238 ****
006: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
--- 232,238 ----
006: SECURITY FIX: January 20, 2003
All architectures
A double free in
! cvs(1)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the
user running cvs. This is only an issue when the cvs command is
being run on a user's behalf as a different user. This means that,
***************
*** 245,251 ****
005: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
--- 245,251 ----
005: SECURITY FIX: November 14, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow in
! named(8)
could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of named.
On OpenBSD, named runs as a non-root user in a chrooted environment
which mitigates the effects of this bug.
***************
*** 256,262 ****
004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
A logic error in the
! pool
kernel memory allocator could cause memory corruption in low-memory situations,
causing the system to crash.
--- 256,262 ----
004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
A logic error in the
! pool
kernel memory allocator could cause memory corruption in low-memory situations,
causing the system to crash.
***************
*** 266,272 ****
003: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 266,272 ----
003: SECURITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
An attacker can bypass the restrictions imposed by sendmail's restricted shell,
! smrsh(8),
and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of his own account.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
***************
*** 275,283 ****
002: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Network
! bridges
running
! pf
with scrubbing enabled could cause mbuf corruption,
causing the system to crash.
--- 275,283 ----
002: RELIABILITY FIX: November 6, 2002
All architectures
Network
! bridges
running
! pf
with scrubbing enabled could cause mbuf corruption,
causing the system to crash.
***************
*** 287,293 ****
001: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.
--- 287,293 ----
001: SECURITY FIX: October 21, 2002
All architectures
A buffer overflow can occur in the
! kadmind(8)
daemon, leading to possible remote crash or exploit.
A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.