===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/errata43.html,v
retrieving revision 1.57
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -c -r1.57 -r1.58
*** www/errata43.html	2017/03/28 04:04:52	1.57
--- www/errata43.html	2017/03/28 06:41:18	1.58
***************
*** 83,89 ****
  
  <ul>
  
! <li id="013_pf">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>013: RELIABILITY FIX: April 11, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  When pf attempts to perform translation on a specially crafted IP datagram,
--- 83,89 ----
  
  <ul>
  
! <li id="p013_pf">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>013: RELIABILITY FIX: April 11, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  When pf attempts to perform translation on a specially crafted IP datagram,
***************
*** 104,110 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="012_openssl">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>012: RELIABILITY FIX: April 8, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The OpenSSL ASN.1 handling code could be forced to perform invalid memory
--- 104,110 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p012_openssl">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>012: RELIABILITY FIX: April 8, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The OpenSSL ASN.1 handling code could be forced to perform invalid memory
***************
*** 122,128 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="011_sudo">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>011: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  sudo(8) may allow a user listed in the sudoers file to run a command
--- 122,128 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p011_sudo">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>011: SECURITY FIX: February 22, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  sudo(8) may allow a user listed in the sudoers file to run a command
***************
*** 135,141 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="010_bgpd">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>010: RELIABILITY FIX: February 18, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  bgpd(8) did not correctly prepend its own AS to very long AS paths, causing
--- 135,141 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p010_bgpd">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>010: RELIABILITY FIX: February 18, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  bgpd(8) did not correctly prepend its own AS to very long AS paths, causing
***************
*** 145,151 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="009_bgpd">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>009: RELIABILITY FIX: January 30, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Upon reception of an invalid update with 4-byte AS attributes, bgpd -
--- 145,151 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p009_bgpd">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>009: RELIABILITY FIX: January 30, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Upon reception of an invalid update with 4-byte AS attributes, bgpd -
***************
*** 158,164 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="008_bind">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>008: SECURITY FIX: January 14, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  named(8) did not correctly check the return value of a DSA verification
--- 158,164 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p008_bind">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>008: SECURITY FIX: January 14, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  named(8) did not correctly check the return value of a DSA verification
***************
*** 170,176 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="007_openssl">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>007: SECURITY FIX: January 9, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The OpenSSL libraries did not correctly check the return value from
--- 170,176 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p007_openssl">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>007: SECURITY FIX: January 9, 2009</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The OpenSSL libraries did not correctly check the return value from
***************
*** 184,190 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="006_ndp">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>006: SECURITY FIX: October 2, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The Neighbor Discovery Protocol (ndp) did not correctly verify neighbor
--- 184,190 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p006_ndp">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>006: SECURITY FIX: October 2, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  The Neighbor Discovery Protocol (ndp) did not correctly verify neighbor
***************
*** 197,203 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="005_pcb">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>005: RELIABILITY FIX: July 29, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Some kinds of IPv6 usage would leak kernel memory (in particular, this path
--- 197,203 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p005_pcb">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>005: RELIABILITY FIX: July 29, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Some kinds of IPv6 usage would leak kernel memory (in particular, this path
***************
*** 208,214 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="004_bind">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>004: SECURITY FIX: July 23, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  <strong>2nd revision, July 23, 2008</strong><br>
--- 208,214 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p004_bind">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>004: SECURITY FIX: July 23, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  <strong>2nd revision, July 23, 2008</strong><br>
***************
*** 220,226 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="003_xorg">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>003: SECURITY FIX: July 15, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in X.Org.<br>
--- 220,226 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p003_xorg">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>003: SECURITY FIX: July 15, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in X.Org.<br>
***************
*** 239,245 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="002_openssh2">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>002: SECURITY FIX: April 3, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Avoid possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections with sshd(8)
--- 239,245 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p002_openssh2">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>002: SECURITY FIX: April 3, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  Avoid possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections with sshd(8)
***************
*** 249,255 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="001_openssh">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>001: SECURITY FIX: March 30, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  sshd(8) would execute ~/.ssh/rc even when a sshd_config(5) <em>ForceCommand</em>
--- 249,255 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li id="p001_openssh">
  <font color="#009000"><strong>001: SECURITY FIX: March 30, 2008</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
  sshd(8) would execute ~/.ssh/rc even when a sshd_config(5) <em>ForceCommand</em>