===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/errata55.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -c -r1.26 -r1.27
*** www/errata55.html	2014/11/17 19:55:00	1.26
--- www/errata55.html	2014/11/17 19:58:52	1.27
***************
*** 220,236 ****
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li><a name="013_pfctl"></a>
! <font color="#009000"><strong>013: SECURITY FIX: November 17, 2014</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
! PF rules of the form "pass from {192.0.2.1 2001:db8::1} to (pppoe0)" will
! apply an incorrect /32 mask to the dynamic IPv6 address, allowing access to
! a wide address range rather than the intended single host.
! As a workaround, list the IPv4 address last, i.e. "{2001:db8::1 192.0.2.1}".
  <br>
! <a href="http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.5/common/013_pfctl.patch.sig">
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
  </ul>
  
--- 220,246 ----
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
  
! <li><a name="014_pfctl"></a>
! <font color="#009000"><strong>014: RELIABILITY FIX: November 17, 2014</strong></font>
  &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
! A PF rule using an IPv4 address
! followed by an IPv6 address and then a dynamic address, e.g. "pass
! from {192.0.2.1 2001:db8::1} to (pppoe0)", will have an incorrect /32
! mask applied to the dynamic address.
  <br>
! <a href="http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.5/common/014_pfctl.patch.sig">
  A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
  <p>
+ 
+ <li><a name="015_asr"></a>
+ <font color="#009000"><strong>015: RELIABILITY FIX: November 17, 2014</strong></font>
+ &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
+ Querying an invalid hostname with gethostbyname(3) could cause a NULL deref.
+ <br>
+ <a href="http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.5/common/015_asr.patch.sig">
+ A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
+ <p>
+ 
  
  </ul>