[BACK]Return to lyrics.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Diff for /www/lyrics.html between version 1.121 and 1.122

version 1.121, 2010/12/03 18:18:55 version 1.122, 2010/12/28 18:08:04
Line 2032 
Line 2032 
 standard solution for this problem.  Despite this legal pressure, the  standard solution for this problem.  Despite this legal pressure, the
 IETF community forged ahead and published VRRP as a standard even  IETF community forged ahead and published VRRP as a standard even
 though there was a patent in the space.  Why?  though there was a patent in the space.  Why?
 <a href="http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/documents/standards/general-comms/ietf/vrrp/vrrp-minutes-97dec.txt">  <a href="http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/doc/ietf/vrrp/vrrp-minutes-97dec.txt">
 There was much deliberation</a>  There was much deliberation</a>
 at all levels of the IETF, and unfortunately for all of us the  at all levels of the IETF, and unfortunately for all of us the
 politicians within eventually decided to allow patented technology in  politicians within eventually decided to allow patented technology in
Line 2059 
Line 2059 
 small piece of which is Cisco attempting to use the HSRP patent  small piece of which is Cisco attempting to use the HSRP patent
 against Alcatel for their use of VRRP.  Some IETF working group  against Alcatel for their use of VRRP.  Some IETF working group
 members took note of our complaints,  members took note of our complaints,
 <a href="http://lists.microshaft.org/pipermail/dmca_discuss/2003-April/004702.html">  <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20061109082106/http://lists.microshaft.org/pipermail/dmca_discuss/2003-April/004702.html">
 however an attempt in April 2003 to have the IETF abandon the use of  however an attempt in April 2003 to have the IETF abandon the use of
 patented technology failed to "reach consensus" in the IETF</a>.  patented technology failed to "reach consensus" in the IETF</a>.
 <p>  <p>

Legend:
Removed from v.1.121  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.122