===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/lyrics.html,v
retrieving revision 1.121
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -r1.121 -r1.122
--- www/lyrics.html	2010/12/03 18:18:55	1.121
+++ www/lyrics.html	2010/12/28 18:08:04	1.122
@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@
 standard solution for this problem.  Despite this legal pressure, the
 IETF community forged ahead and published VRRP as a standard even
 though there was a patent in the space.  Why?
-<a href="http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/documents/standards/general-comms/ietf/vrrp/vrrp-minutes-97dec.txt">
+<a href="http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/doc/ietf/vrrp/vrrp-minutes-97dec.txt">
 There was much deliberation</a>
 at all levels of the IETF, and unfortunately for all of us the
 politicians within eventually decided to allow patented technology in
@@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@
 small piece of which is Cisco attempting to use the HSRP patent
 against Alcatel for their use of VRRP.  Some IETF working group
 members took note of our complaints,
-<a href="http://lists.microshaft.org/pipermail/dmca_discuss/2003-April/004702.html">
+<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20061109082106/http://lists.microshaft.org/pipermail/dmca_discuss/2003-April/004702.html">
 however an attempt in April 2003 to have the IETF abandon the use of
 patented technology failed to "reach consensus" in the IETF</a>.
 <p>
@@ -2861,7 +2861,7 @@
 <hr>
 <a href="index.html"><img height="24" width="24" src="back.gif" border="0" alt="OpenBSD"></a>
 <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: lyrics.html,v 1.121 2010/12/03 18:18:55 deraadt Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: lyrics.html,v 1.122 2010/12/28 18:08:04 deraadt Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>