===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/lyrics.html,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
--- www/lyrics.html	2005/04/19 05:27:19	1.51
+++ www/lyrics.html	2005/04/19 08:17:03	1.52
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
 Over the last six months, this came to a head in the OpenBSD project.
 We asked our users to help us petition numerous vendors so that we
 could get chipset documentation or redistributable firmware.  Certainly, we did
-not succeed for some vendors.  But we very well influenced some vendors, in
+not succeed for some vendors.  But we did influence some vendors, in
 particular the Taiwanese (Ralink and Realtek), who have given us
 everything we need.  We also reverse engineered the Atheros chipsets.<br>
 <br>
@@ -95,11 +95,11 @@
 <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=awi">ADMTek</a>,
 <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ath">Atheros</a>.
 Our manual pages attempt to explain which vendors (ie. D-Link) box
-which chipsets into product.
+which chipsets into which product.
 <br>
 <br>
 Send a message that open support for hardware matters.  A vendor in
-Redmond largely continues their practices because they get
+Redmont largely continues their practices because they get
 the chipset documentation years before everyone else does.
 What really upsets us the most is that some Linux vendors are signing
 Non-Disclosure Agreements with vendors, or contracts that let them
@@ -1225,6 +1225,6 @@
 <a href=index.html><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
 <a href="mailto:www@openbsd.org">
 Public Discussion Forum about contents of these web pages: www@openbsd.org</a>
-<br><small>$OpenBSD: lyrics.html,v 1.51 2005/04/19 05:27:19 jcs Exp $</small>
+<br><small>$OpenBSD: lyrics.html,v 1.52 2005/04/19 08:17:03 deraadt Exp $</small>
 </body>
 </html>