[BACK]Return to security.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Diff for /www/security.html between version 1.30 and 1.31

version 1.30, 1998/02/24 00:57:55 version 1.31, 1998/02/24 01:03:14
Line 46 
Line 46 
 source code which had been audited earlier had to be re-audited with  source code which had been audited earlier had to be re-audited with
 these new flaws in mind.<p>  these new flaws in mind.<p>
   
   Some members of our security auditing team work for
   <a href=http://www.secnet.com>Secure Networks</a>, the company that
   makes the industry's premier network security scanning software.
   This company does a lot of security research, and this fits in well
   with the OpenBSD stance.<p>
   
 Another facet of our security auditing process is it's proactiveness.  Another facet of our security auditing process is it's proactiveness.
 In almost all cases we have found that the determination of  In almost all cases we have found that the determination of
 exploitability is not an issue.  During our auditing process we find  exploitability is not an issue.  During our auditing process we find
Legend:
Removed from v.1.30  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.31