=================================================================== RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/security.html,v retrieving revision 1.101 retrieving revision 1.102 diff -u -r1.101 -r1.102 --- www/security.html 1999/08/13 12:31:11 1.101 +++ www/security.html 1999/08/19 06:57:33 1.102 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ fixing security problems.

Like many readers of the - + BUGTRAQ mailing list, we believe in full disclosure of security problems. Security information moves very fast in cracker circles. On the other hand, @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ have fixed many simple and obvious careless programming errors in code and only months later discovered that the problems were in fact exploitable. (Or, more likely someone on -BUGTRAQ +BUGTRAQ would report that other operating systems were vulnerable to a `newly discovered problem', and then it would be discovered that OpenBSD had been fixed in a previous release). In other cases we have been saved @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Our proactive auditing process has really paid off. Statements like ``This problem was fixed in OpenBSD about 6 months ago'' have become commonplace in security forums like -BUGTRAQ.

+BUGTRAQ.

The most intense part of our security auditing happened immediately before the OpenBSD 2.0 release and during the 2.0->2.1 transition, @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ OpenBSD www@openbsd.org
-$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.101 1999/08/13 12:31:11 deraadt Exp $ +$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.102 1999/08/19 06:57:33 deraadt Exp $