===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/security.html,v
retrieving revision 1.196
retrieving revision 1.197
diff -u -r1.196 -r1.197
--- www/security.html	2002/03/07 19:25:37	1.196
+++ www/security.html	2002/03/07 21:47:48	1.197
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 have fixed many simple and obvious careless programming errors in code
 and only months later discovered that the problems were in fact
 exploitable.  (Or, more likely someone on
-<a href=http://www.securityfocus.com/bugtraq/archive>BUGTRAQ</a>
+<a href="http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1">BUGTRAQ</a>
 would report that other operating systems were vulnerable to a `newly
 discovered problem', and then it would be discovered that OpenBSD had
 been fixed in a previous release).  In other cases we have been saved
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
 Our proactive auditing process has really paid off.  Statements like
 ``This problem was fixed in OpenBSD about 6 months ago'' have become
 commonplace in security forums like
-<a href=http://www.securityfocus.com/bugtraq/archive>BUGTRAQ</a>.<p>
+<a href="http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1">BUGTRAQ</a>.<p>
 
 The most intense part of our security auditing happened immediately
 before the OpenBSD 2.0 release and during the 2.0-&gt;2.1 transition,
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@
 <a href=index.html><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
 <br>
-<small>$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.196 2002/03/07 19:25:37 jufi Exp $</small>
+<small>$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.197 2002/03/07 21:47:48 jufi Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>