===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsrepo/anoncvs/cvs/www/security.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
--- www/security.html	1998/02/24 00:57:55	1.30
+++ www/security.html	1998/02/24 01:03:14	1.31
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@
 source code which had been audited earlier had to be re-audited with
 these new flaws in mind.<p>
 
+Some members of our security auditing team work for
+<a href=http://www.secnet.com>Secure Networks</a>, the company that
+makes the industry's premier network security scanning software.
+This company does a lot of security research, and this fits in well
+with the OpenBSD stance.<p>
+
 Another facet of our security auditing process is it's proactiveness.
 In almost all cases we have found that the determination of
 exploitability is not an issue.  During our auditing process we find
@@ -145,7 +151,7 @@
 <a href=index.html><img src=/back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
 <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
 <br>
-<small>$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.30 1998/02/24 00:57:55 deraadt Exp $</small>
+<small>$OpenBSD: security.html,v 1.31 1998/02/24 01:03:14 deraadt Exp $</small>
 
 </body>
 </html>