[BACK]Return to security.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Annotation of www/security.html, Revision 1.20

1.1       deraadt     1: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC  "-//IETF//DTD HTML Strict//EN">
                      2: <html>
                      3: <head>
1.20    ! deraadt     4: <title>OpenBSD Security</title>
1.1       deraadt     5: <link rev=made href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>
                      6: <meta name="resource-type" content="document">
                      7: <meta name="description" content="OpenBSD advisories">
                      8: <meta name="keywords" content="openbsd,main">
                      9: <meta name="distribution" content="global">
                     10: <meta name="copyright" content="This document copyright 1997 by OpenBSD.">
                     11: </head>
                     12:
                     13: <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#23238E">
                     14:
1.2       deraadt    15: <img alt="[OpenBSD]" SRC="/images/smalltitle.gif">
1.1       deraadt    16:
1.2       deraadt    17: <p>
1.12      deraadt    18: <h3><font color=#e00000><strong>OpenBSD Security Views</strong></font></h3>
1.14      deraadt    19: OpenBSD believes in strong security.  Our aspiration is to be NUMBER
1.17      deraadt    20: ONE in the industry for security.  Our open software development model
                     21: permits us to take a more uncompromising view towards increased
                     22: security than Sun, SGI, IBM, HP, or other vendors are able to.  We can
                     23: make changes the vendors would not make.  Also, since OpenBSD is
                     24: exported with cryptography software, we are able to take cryptographic
                     25: approaches towards fixing security problems.
1.12      deraadt    26:
                     27: <p>
1.18      deraadt    28:
                     29: Like most readers of the
1.13      deraadt    30: <a href=http://www.geek-girl.com/bugtraq/index.html>
1.18      deraadt    31: BUGTRAQ mailing list</a>,
                     32: we believe in full disclosure of security problems.  We believe that
                     33: security information moves very fast in crackers circles.  Our
                     34: experience shows that coding and release of proper security fixes
                     35: typically requires about an hour of work resulting in very fast fix
                     36: turnaround.  Thus we think that full disclosure helps the people who
                     37: really care about security.
1.13      deraadt    38:
                     39: <p>
1.15      deraadt    40:
1.12      deraadt    41: Our security auditing team typically has between six and twelve
1.15      deraadt    42: members, and most of us continually search for and fix new security
                     43: holes. We have been auditing since the summer of 1997.  The process we
1.12      deraadt    44: followed to increase security was simply a comprehensive file-by-file
                     45: analysis of every critical software component.  Flaws were found in
                     46: just about every area of the system.  Entire new classes of security
                     47: problems were found while we were doing the audit, and in many cases
                     48: source code which had been audited earlier had to be re-audited with
                     49: these new flaws in mind.
                     50:
                     51: <p>
1.16      deraadt    52: Another facet of our security auditing process is it's proactiveness.
                     53: In almost all cases we have found that the determination of
                     54: exploitability is not an issue.  During our auditing process we find
                     55: many bugs, and endeavor to simply fix them even though exploitability
                     56: is not proven.  We have fixed many simple and obvious careless
                     57: programming errors in code and then only months later discovered that
                     58: the problems were in fact exploitable.  This proactive auditing
                     59: process has really paid off.  Statements like ``This problem was fixed
                     60: in OpenBSD about 6 months ago'' have become commonplace in security
1.19      deraadt    61: forums like <a href=http://www.geek-girl.com/bugtraq/index.html>BUGTRAQ</a>.
1.15      deraadt    62:
                     63: <p>
1.14      deraadt    64: The auditing process is not over yet, and as you can see we continue
                     65: to find and fix new security flaws.
1.12      deraadt    66:
                     67: <p>
                     68: <h3><font color=#e00000><strong>OpenBSD 2.1 Security Advisories</strong></font></h3>
1.11      deraadt    69: These are the OpenBSD 2.1 advisories.  All these problems are solved
                     70: in OpenBSD 2.2.  Some of these problems still exist in other
1.1       deraadt    71: operating systems.
                     72:
                     73: <ul>
1.11      deraadt    74: <li><a href=rfork>Rfork() system call flaw (patch included)</a>
                     75: <li><a href=procfs>Procfs flaws (patch included)</a>
                     76: <li><a href=signals>Deviant Signals (patch included)</a>
1.9       deraadt    77: </ul>
                     78:
                     79: <p>
1.12      deraadt    80: <h3><font color=#e00000><strong>OpenBSD 2.2 Security Advisories</strong></font></h3>
1.11      deraadt    81: These are the OpenBSD 2.2 advisories.  All these problems are
1.9       deraadt    82: solved in OpenBSD current.  Some of these problems still exist in other
1.14      deraadt    83: operating systems.
1.9       deraadt    84:
                     85: <ul>
1.11      deraadt    86: <li><a href=/errata.html#f00f>Intel P5 f00f lockup (patch included)</a>
                     87: <li><a href=/errata.html#sourceroute>
                     88:        Sourcerouted Packet Acceptance (patch included)</a>
                     89: <li><a href=/errata.html#ruserok>Setuid coredump & Ruserok() flaw (patch included)</a>
                     90: <li><a href=/errata.html#mmap>Read-write mmap() flaw (patch included)</a>
1.1       deraadt    91: </ul>
                     92:
1.9       deraadt    93: <p>
1.12      deraadt    94: <h3><font color=#e00000><strong>Other Resources</strong></font></h3>
1.3       deraadt    95: Other security advisories that have (in the past) affected OpenBSD can
1.4       deraadt    96: be found at the <a href=http://www.secnet.com/nav1.html>Secure Networks archive</a>.
1.3       deraadt    97:
1.5       deraadt    98: <p> If you find a new security problem, you can mail it to
1.6       deraadt    99: <a href=mailto:deraadt@openbsd.org>deraadt@openbsd.org</a>.
1.7       deraadt   100: <br>
1.5       deraadt   101: If you wish to PGP encode it (but please only do so if privacy is very
                    102: urgent, since it is inconvenient) use this <a href=pgpkey>pgp key</a>.
                    103:
1.2       deraadt   104: <hr>
1.1       deraadt   105: <font size="-1">
1.19      deraadt   106: <em>This site Copyright &copy; 1996-1998 OpenBSD.</em><br>
1.20    ! deraadt   107: $OpenBSD: index.html,v 1.19 1998/02/20 12:33:50 deraadt Exp $
1.1       deraadt   108: </font>
                    109:
                    110: </BODY>
                    111: </HTML>