[BACK]Return to testimonials.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Annotation of www/testimonials.html, Revision 1.25

1.25    ! bentley     1: <!doctype html>
        !             2: <html lang=en>
        !             3: <meta charset=utf-8>
        !             4:
1.23      tj          5: <title>OpenBSD: Users' Views</title>
1.22      tb          6: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
                      7: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="openbsd.css">
1.24      tb          8: <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.openbsd.org/testimonials.html">
1.22      tb          9:
1.25    ! bentley    10: <h2 id=OpenBSD>
1.22      tb         11: <a href="index.html">
1.25    ! bentley    12: <i>Open</i><b>BSD</b></a>
        !            13: Users' Views
1.22      tb         14: </h2>
1.25    ! bentley    15:
1.22      tb         16: <hr>
1.25    ! bentley    17:
1.5       ian        18: <p>
1.25    ! bentley    19: Many users have commented on their use of OpenBSD.
1.10      ian        20: The following are unsolicited comments from our public mailing lists or,
1.3       ian        21: occasionally, other mailing lists (these have links to the original articles).
1.6       ian        22: Postings have been shortened, and edited slightly for spelling and grammar,
1.1       ian        23: but are otherwise unchanged.
                     24:
1.8       deraadt    25: <hr>
                     26:
1.19      sthen      27: <h3>Jules Desforges wrote this in an introduction to the
1.22      tb         28: <a href="http://ukopenbsdusers.saneusergroup.org.uk/pipermail/uk-openbsd-users/2010-June/000022.html">
                     29: ukopenbsdusers mailing list</a>:</h3>
1.19      sthen      30: <p>
                     31: My name is Jules and I live in Kent. I've been using OpenBSD since 2.9.
                     32: I have OpenBSD running on 6 x Nexcom NSA1086's to provide core routing
                     33: between our Data Centres. All the routes are running from read-only
                     34: Compact Flash. Largely runs untroubled, pushing ~ 400Mb/s.
                     35: Main motivation was the cost savings compared to equivalent
                     36: Junpier/Cisco kit.
                     37: I hope to be testing the new MPLS code soon.
                     38:
1.13      henning    39: <h3><a href="mailto:SKohrman@apu.edu">Shawn Kohrman</a> writes:</h3>
                     40: <p>
                     41: As a Security/Network Administrator for over ten years, I have to say
                     42: OpenBSD is hands down the best out-of-the-box OS I have seen yet.  I
1.14      henning    43: have worked with MS NT/2000, Linux (from its humble beginnings),
1.13      henning    44: Solaris, etc.  OpenBSD is simple, clean, secure and reliable.  Many
                     45: thanks to the developers for an outstanding job.
                     46:
1.10      ian        47: <h3><a href="mailto:kristoff@phatness.net">Kris Wilkinson</a> writes:</h3>
                     48: <p>
                     49: I've been securing networks for quite some time now, and until recently
                     50: when I installed Open BSD 3.0 I never realized how easy my life could have
                     51: been had I tried it earlier.
                     52: After experiencing all the "other" operating systems available, 3.0 has to
                     53: be the most secure, easily managed and well organized package I have ever seen.
                     54: Not only is it completely cutting edge, it focuses on the smaller points of
                     55: security which I'm tired of having to manually tweak every time you setup a box.
                     56: <p>
                     57: I am securing networks all over Alberta using your fantastic
                     58: setup. Thank you so much! Keep up the incredible work.
                     59:
1.8       deraadt    60: <h3>Matthew Haas says this:</h3>
1.1       ian        61: <p>
                     62: I've been very impressed with OpenBSD since my decision to install it.
                     63: Definitely a great system, reminds me of my Slackware days, but better.
                     64: <p>
                     65: Thanks.
                     66:
1.8       deraadt    67: <h3>
1.7       ian        68: <a href="mailto:webmaster@2600.org.au">Grant Bayley</a>,
1.8       deraadt    69: an IT Manager from Australia, writes:</h3>
1.1       ian        70: <p>
                     71: By way of success stories, since a few of us at 2600 Australia started
                     72: using OpenBSD about 12 months ago now in some form or another, we've seen...
                     73: friends load it onto their machines and been simply amazed
                     74: at the quality of it, in particular the forethought that goes into
                     75: securing things out of the box.
                     76: <p>
                     77: We've also had one of our guys working at an ISP go head-to-head with an
                     78: in-house SuSE zealot of sorts on a compatibility, stability and security
                     79: test in advance of them selecting an operating system for their servers
                     80: (which, while using RedHat, had been rooted at least once).  OpenBSD passed
1.6       ian        81: with flying colors and as of today, they're beginning a roll-out of 2.6
1.1       ian        82: onto their servers, mostly using stock components and software from the
                     83: ports tree (qmail, cucipop etc).
                     84:
1.8       deraadt    85: <h3>System and Network Administrator Jeff Schneiter offers this:</h3>
1.1       ian        86: <p> With a frozen budget it sure makes one squeeze every last
                     87: bit of power out of whatever hardware one can lay his hands
                     88: on... and thanks to OpenBSD, I have been doing just that.
                     89:
1.25    ! bentley    90: <h3 id=sarendal><a href="mailto:tony@polarcap.org">Tony Sarendal</a> says this:</h3>
1.1       ian        91: <p>I tried OpenBSD because of the IPsec support.
                     92: The reason I stick with it is because it really is nice to use
                     93: and it gives a feeling of quality which no other OS can match.
                     94: <p>
                     95: I did some programming on an OpenBSD machine, after this I really
                     96: appreciated the man pages. Other Unices I used had man pages that
                     97: simply weren't any good.
                     98: <p>
                     99: Keep up the good work guys.
                    100:
1.8       deraadt   101: <h3>Security Engineer Tyler Allison writes:</h3>
1.1       ian       102: <p>
1.6       ian       103: I have installed, secured, and maintained Linux, Windows NT and OpenBSD in
                    104: highly secure environments. (yes you can secure Linux and Windows NT in
1.1       ian       105: this environment :)  ).  Having said that I have to point out that if you
                    106: want a minimum administration to keep up with security issues option you
                    107: need to pick OpenBSD by far.  It is not uncommon for people to go years without
                    108: updating their production OpenBSD machines because they are just rock solid
                    109: and there are no known "remote" vulnerabilities.  Thus no good reason to
                    110: upgrade...
                    111: <p>
                    112: I would feel perfectly happy to have one of my [novice] interns do a basic
                    113: OpenBSD install on a PC (no extra security work after the install) and then put
                    114: the companies crown jewels on that machine and then walk away for a year.
                    115: Knowing full well that machine hasn't crashed, been broken into or in need
                    116: of an OS upgrade.  You can't say that about NT or Linux.
1.14      henning   117: Or if you do you obviously haven't ever used the product that way :)
1.1       ian       118: <p>
                    119: Another thing that I hear people point out is go check your local exploit
                    120: site or vulnerability alert mailing list and see if you can find a "remote"
                    121: root level exploit that works on OpenBSD. I dare say you won't find any that
                    122: are less than 12 months old.
                    123:
1.8       deraadt   124: <h3>Jan Johansson gave this reply to a "how do I build a cheap web server?" query:</h3>
1.1       ian       125: <p>
                    126: I work today with Solaris, OpenBSD, NT Server, NT Workstation and Win 95.
                    127: <p>
                    128: After reading Bugtraq for some weeks I will say that I will never put
                    129: any (important) machine on the Internet if there is not a firewall in
                    130: front and for packet filtering I go for OpenBSD...
                    131: <p>
1.6       ian       132: For a cheap web server I say hardware from a known vendor, an ordered
1.1       ian       133: OpenBSD CD-ROM and Apache...
                    134:
1.8       deraadt   135: <h3><a href="mailto:wyodlows@nj.devry.edu">
                    136: William Yodlowsky</a> at Devry Institute wrote:</h3>
1.1       ian       137:
1.25    ! bentley   138: <p>
        !           139: [A few] years ago I was just getting into system administration.  I learned
1.1       ian       140: Linux first.  Then one of our old (I mean *really* old) BSDi servers
                    141: crashed, and it was up to me to rebuild the system.
                    142: <p>
                    143: I looked at FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux.  In the end, it came down
                    144: to "secure and stable" that took the prize.  OpenBSD 2.1 was installed.
                    145: <p>
                    146: Since then, I've run 2.1-2.5 on everything from production servers to
                    147: laptops.  We've never (repeat: NEVER) had a break-in.
                    148: <p>
                    149: A coworker setup a RedHat based box to test his skills at setting up SSL
                    150: and a secure web site.
                    151: It was hacked literally overnight, and by the next morning was attacking
                    152: other sites.
                    153: <p>
                    154: Our OpenBSD servers were probed and then left alone.
                    155: <p>
                    156: In the intervening two years, that original server got upgraded
                    157: and patched several
                    158: times and the OS never gave us reason to question the reliability or
                    159: security of OpenBSD.
                    160: <p>
                    161: We have another box, acting as a router for about 800 workstations doing
                    162: very basic filtering and NAT.  It's on a P120 with 32MB RAM and typically
                    163: the uptime would look like this:
                    164: <pre>
                    165: % uptime
                    166:  9:05PM  up 266 days,  4:23, 1 user, load averages: 0.06, 0.06, 0.06
                    167: %</pre>
                    168: <p>As well, OpenBSD runs on my laptop.
1.6       ian       169: A Gateway Solo 2500 with a Xircom modem, and a Linksys fast Ethernet NIC.
1.1       ian       170: <p>
                    171: And it never crashes :)
                    172: <p>
1.4       ian       173: One other incident that made me a believer... we were pingbombed
                    174: [perhaps a predecessor to the early2000 DDOS attacks?].  I mean,
1.1       ian       175: 900 different hosts on different networks floodpinging an OpenBSD 2.3 box
1.6       ian       176: simultaneously, while it was processing email and web pages for 3500 users.
1.1       ian       177: <p>
                    178: It was a P133 with 64MB ram.  And it didn't go down.  It got a bit slower,
                    179: but never crashed :-)
                    180:
1.8       deraadt   181: <h3>John J. Adelsberger III said this about us in Bruce Schneier's
1.1       ian       182: <a href="http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0004.html#CommentsfromReaders">
1.8       deraadt   183: Crypto-Gram</a>:</h3>
1.25    ! bentley   184: <p>
1.2       ian       185: (the comments he is responding to are Schneier's)
1.25    ! bentley   186: <blockquote>
        !           187: <p>
        !           188: Real systems show no signs of becoming less
        !           189: complex. In fact, they are becoming more complex,
        !           190: faster and faster. Microsoft Windows is a poster
        !           191: child for this trend to complexity.
        !           192: <p>
        !           193: ...
1.1       ian       194: <p>
1.25    ! bentley   195: The other choice is to slow down, to simplify,
        !           196: and to try to add security.
        !           197: </blockquote>
        !           198: <p>
        !           199: OpenBSD does this. <em>I am unaware of any other group whose workings
        !           200: are publicly viewable that does so</em> [emphasis added], which is regrettable, because
1.1       ian       201: I would prefer not to have this appear as an OpenBSD plug; rather,
                    202: my purpose is to point out that not only is this approach feasible,
                    203: but it is being done.
                    204:
1.8       deraadt   205: <h3>Andrew Hermetz commented as follows:</h3>
1.1       ian       206: <p>Hey all,
                    207: <p>Just wanted to drop a line and thank all who have worked to make OpenBSD
                    208: such a clean, cool, &amp; efficient project.
                    209: <p>Major kudos to Theo for being a man ahead of his time! ;-)
                    210: <p>As I have to frequently explain to people *why* security is important at
                    211: all ("if you have nothing to hide...", "nothing you do is important enough to
1.6       ian       212: warrant encryption...", "only criminals and terrorists need to sneak around
1.1       ian       213: anonymously...", etc. ad nauseam), let alone *why* it's important in this day
                    214: and age of personal networks behind a DSL or even a full T1, I love being able
1.6       ian       215: to point them to a page which sets out a well-reasoned explanation for taking
1.1       ian       216: computer security seriously.
                    217: <p>[... OpenBSD installed]
1.25    ! bentley   218: effortlessly onto a Pentium 90 Compaq LTE 5100 laptop &mdash; even the no-name
1.1       ian       219: brand LAN card came right up and did a kickass install over a friend's office
                    220: T1. When I sing its praises, the thing that seems to get most people is its
1.10      ian       221: spartan look &amp; feel, but I like knowing where everything is and not having a
1.1       ian       222: distro that shoves [stuff] into dark corners I'll never find...
1.17      grunk     223:
                    224: <h3><a href="mailto:ben@wbpsystems.com">Ben Smith</a>, president of
                    225: <a href="http://www.wbpsystems.com">wbp systems</a> says:</h3>
1.25    ! bentley   226: <p>
1.17      grunk     227: OpenBSD is the most secure operating system
1.18      grunk     228: <a href="http://www.wbpsystems.com">wbp systems</a> has ever used.
1.17      grunk     229: With all of our products, OpenBSD has allowed us to focus on our customers
                    230: instead of tweaking the OS to make it secure.
                    231: Internally we use OpenBSD for everything imaginable.
                    232: With its rock solid performance, we never have to worry about a file
                    233: server, proxy server or application server crashing.