[BACK]Return to testimonials.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Annotation of www/testimonials.html, Revision 1.3

1.1       ian         1: <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
                      2:                  "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
                      3: <html>
                      4: <head>
                      5:        <title>OpenBSD: Users' Views</title>
                      6:     <meta name="resource-type" content="document">
                      7:     <meta name="description" content="Users talk about OpenBSD">
                      8:     <meta name="keywords" content="openbsd,users">
                      9:     <meta name="distribution" content="global">
                     10:     <meta name="copyright" content="This document copyright 2000 by OpenBSD.">
                     11: </head>
                     12: <body bgcolor="white">
                     13: <h1>OpenBSD: Users' Views</h1>
                     14: <p>Many users have commented on their use of OpenBSD.
                     15: The following are all extracts from our public mailing lists or,
1.3     ! ian        16: occasionally, other mailing lists (these have links to the original articles).
        !            17: Postings have been shortened, and edited slighly for spelling and grammar,
1.1       ian        18: but are otherwise unchanged.
                     19:
                     20: <h2>Matthew Haas says this:</h2>
                     21: <p>
                     22: I've been very impressed with OpenBSD since my decision to install it.
                     23: Definitely a great system, reminds me of my Slackware days, but better.
                     24: <p>
                     25: Thanks.
                     26:
                     27: <h2>Grant Bayley, an IT Manager from Australia, writes:</h2>
                     28: <p>
                     29: By way of success stories, since a few of us at 2600 Australia started
                     30: using OpenBSD about 12 months ago now in some form or another, we've seen...
                     31: friends load it onto their machines and been simply amazed
                     32: at the quality of it, in particular the forethought that goes into
                     33: securing things out of the box.
                     34: <p>
                     35: We've also had one of our guys working at an ISP go head-to-head with an
                     36: in-house SuSE zealot of sorts on a compatibility, stability and security
                     37: test in advance of them selecting an operating system for their servers
                     38: (which, while using RedHat, had been rooted at least once).  OpenBSD passed
                     39: with flying colours and as of today, they're beginning a rollout of 2.6
                     40: onto their servers, mostly using stock components and software from the
                     41: ports tree (qmail, cucipop etc).
                     42:
                     43: <h2>System and Network Administrator Jeff Schneiter offers this:</h2>
                     44: <p> With a frozen budget it sure makes one squeeze every last
                     45: bit of power out of whatever hardware one can lay his hands
                     46: on... and thanks to OpenBSD, I have been doing just that.
                     47:
1.2       ian        48: <h2><a name=sarendal href="mailto:tony@polarcap.org">Tony Sarendal</a> says this:</h2>
1.1       ian        49: <p>I tried OpenBSD because of the IPsec support.
                     50: The reason I stick with it is because it really is nice to use
                     51: and it gives a feeling of quality which no other OS can match.
                     52: <p>
                     53: I did some programming on an OpenBSD machine, after this I really
                     54: appreciated the man pages. Other Unices I used had man pages that
                     55: simply weren't any good.
                     56: <p>
                     57: Keep up the good work guys.
                     58:
                     59: <h2>Security Engineer Tyler Allison writes:</h2>
                     60: <p>
                     61: I have installed, secured, and maintained Linux, WindowsNT and OpenBSD in
                     62: highly secure environments. (yes you can secure Linux and WindowsNT in
                     63: this environment :)  ).  Having said that I have to point out that if you
                     64: want a minimum administration to keep up with security issues option you
                     65: need to pick OpenBSD by far.  It is not uncommon for people to go years without
                     66: updating their production OpenBSD machines because they are just rock solid
                     67: and there are no known "remote" vulnerabilities.  Thus no good reason to
                     68: upgrade...
                     69: <p>
                     70: I would feel perfectly happy to have one of my [novice] interns do a basic
                     71: OpenBSD install on a PC (no extra security work after the install) and then put
                     72: the companies crown jewels on that machine and then walk away for a year.
                     73: Knowing full well that machine hasn't crashed, been broken into or in need
                     74: of an OS upgrade.  You can't say that about NT or Linux.
                     75: Or if you do you obviously havent ever used the product that way :)
                     76: <p>
                     77: Another thing that I hear people point out is go check your local exploit
                     78: site or vulnerability alert mailing list and see if you can find a "remote"
                     79: root level exploit that works on OpenBSD. I dare say you won't find any that
                     80: are less than 12 months old.
                     81:
1.2       ian        82: <h2>Jan Johansson gave this reply to a "how do I build a cheap web server?" query:</h2>
1.1       ian        83: <p>
                     84: I work today with Solaris, OpenBSD, NT Server, NT Workstation and Win 95.
                     85: <p>
                     86: After reading Bugtraq for some weeks I will say that I will never put
                     87: any (important) machine on the Internet if there is not a firewall in
                     88: front and for packet filtering I go for OpenBSD...
                     89: <p>
                     90: For a cheap webserver I say hardware from a known vendor, an ordered
                     91: OpenBSD CD-ROM and Apache...
                     92:
                     93:
                     94: <h2>William Yodlowsky at Devry Institute wrote:</h2>
                     95:
                     96: <p>Two years ago I was just getting into system administration.  I learned
                     97: Linux first.  Then one of our old (I mean *really* old) BSDi servers
                     98: crashed, and it was up to me to rebuild the system.
                     99: <p>
                    100: I looked at FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux.  In the end, it came down
                    101: to "secure and stable" that took the prize.  OpenBSD 2.1 was installed.
                    102: <p>
                    103: Since then, I've run 2.1-2.5 on everything from production servers to
                    104: laptops.  We've never (repeat: NEVER) had a break-in.
                    105: <p>
                    106: A coworker setup a RedHat based box to test his skills at setting up SSL
                    107: and a secure web site.
                    108: It was hacked literally overnight, and by the next morning was attacking
                    109: other sites.
                    110: <p>
                    111: Our OpenBSD servers were probed and then left alone.
                    112: <p>
                    113: In the intervening two years, that original server got upgraded
                    114: and patched several
                    115: times and the OS never gave us reason to question the reliability or
                    116: security of OpenBSD.
                    117: <p>
                    118: We have another box, acting as a router for about 800 workstations doing
                    119: very basic filtering and NAT.  It's on a P120 with 32MB RAM and typically
                    120: the uptime would look like this:
                    121: <pre>
                    122: % uptime
                    123:  9:05PM  up 266 days,  4:23, 1 user, load averages: 0.06, 0.06, 0.06
                    124: %</pre>
                    125: <p>As well, OpenBSD runs on my laptop.
                    126: A Gateway Solo 2500 with a Xircom modem, and a Linksys fast ethernet NIC.
                    127: <p>
                    128: And it never crashes :)
                    129: <p>
                    130: One other incident that made me a believer... we were pingbombed.  I mean,
                    131: 900 different hosts on different networks floodpinging an OpenBSD 2.3 box
                    132: simultaneously, while it was processing email and webpages for 3500 users.
                    133: <p>
                    134: It was a P133 with 64MB ram.  And it didn't go down.  It got a bit slower,
                    135: but never crashed :-)
                    136:
1.3     ! ian       137: <h2>John J. Adelsberger III said this about us in Bruce Schneier's
1.1       ian       138: <a href="http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0004.html#CommentsfromReaders">
1.2       ian       139: Crypto-Gram</a>:</h2>
                    140: (the comments he is responding to are Schneier's)
1.1       ian       141: <br>
                    142: <br>&lt; Real systems show no signs of becoming less
                    143: <br>&lt; complex. In fact, they are becoming more complex,
                    144: <br>&lt; faster and faster. Microsoft Windows is a poster
                    145: <br>&lt; child for this trend to complexity.
                    146: <br>
                    147: <br>...
                    148: <br>
                    149: <br>&lt; The other choice is to slow down, to simplify,
                    150: <br>&lt; and to try to add security.
                    151: <p>
                    152: OpenBSD does this. <I>I am unaware of any other group whose workings
                    153: are publicly viewable that does so</I> [emphasis added], which is regrettable, because
                    154: I would prefer not to have this appear as an OpenBSD plug; rather,
                    155: my purpose is to point out that not only is this approach feasible,
                    156: but it is being done.
                    157:
                    158: <h2>Andrew Hermetz commented as follows:</h2>
                    159: <p>Hey all,
                    160: <p>Just wanted to drop a line and thank all who have worked to make OpenBSD
                    161: such a clean, cool, &amp; efficient project.
                    162: <p>Major kudos to Theo for being a man ahead of his time! ;-)
                    163: <p>As I have to frequently explain to people *why* security is important at
                    164: all ("if you have nothing to hide...", "nothing you do is important enough to
                    165: warrent encryption...", "only criminals and terrorists need to sneak around
                    166: anonymously...", etc. ad nauseam), let alone *why* it's important in this day
                    167: and age of personal networks behind a DSL or even a full T1, I love being able
                    168: to point them to a page which sets out a well-reasoned explaination for taking
                    169: computer security seriously.
                    170: <p>[... OpenBSD installed]
                    171: effortlessly onto a Pentium 90 Compaq LTE 5100 laptop -- even the no-name
                    172: brand LAN card came right up and did a kickass install over a friend's office
                    173: T1. When I sing its praises, the thing that seems to get most people is its
                    174: spartan look & feel, but I like knowing where everything is and not having a
                    175: distro that shoves [stuff] into dark corners I'll never find...
                    176: <hr></hr>
                    177: <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
                    178: <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
1.3     ! ian       179: <br><small>$OpenBSD: testimonials.html,v 1.2 2000/04/20 13:07:44 ian Exp $</small>
1.1       ian       180: </body>
                    181: </html>