[BACK]Return to testimonials.html CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [local] / www

Annotation of www/testimonials.html, Revision 1.7

1.1       ian         1: <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
                      2:                  "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
                      3: <html>
                      4: <head>
                      5:        <title>OpenBSD: Users' Views</title>
                      6:     <meta name="resource-type" content="document">
                      7:     <meta name="description" content="Users talk about OpenBSD">
                      8:     <meta name="keywords" content="openbsd,users">
                      9:     <meta name="distribution" content="global">
                     10:     <meta name="copyright" content="This document copyright 2000 by OpenBSD.">
                     11: </head>
1.5       ian        12: <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#23238E">
                     13: <img alt="[OpenBSD]" height=30 width=141 SRC="images/smalltitle.gif">
                     14: <p>
1.7     ! ian        15: <h2><font color=#e00000>OpenBSD: Users' View</font></h2>
1.1       ian        16: <p>Many users have commented on their use of OpenBSD.
                     17: The following are all extracts from our public mailing lists or,
1.3       ian        18: occasionally, other mailing lists (these have links to the original articles).
1.6       ian        19: Postings have been shortened, and edited slightly for spelling and grammar,
1.1       ian        20: but are otherwise unchanged.
                     21:
                     22: <h2>Matthew Haas says this:</h2>
                     23: <p>
                     24: I've been very impressed with OpenBSD since my decision to install it.
                     25: Definitely a great system, reminds me of my Slackware days, but better.
                     26: <p>
                     27: Thanks.
                     28:
1.7     ! ian        29: <h2>
        !            30: <a href="mailto:webmaster@2600.org.au">Grant Bayley</a>,
        !            31: an IT Manager from Australia, writes:</h2>
1.1       ian        32: <p>
                     33: By way of success stories, since a few of us at 2600 Australia started
                     34: using OpenBSD about 12 months ago now in some form or another, we've seen...
                     35: friends load it onto their machines and been simply amazed
                     36: at the quality of it, in particular the forethought that goes into
                     37: securing things out of the box.
                     38: <p>
                     39: We've also had one of our guys working at an ISP go head-to-head with an
                     40: in-house SuSE zealot of sorts on a compatibility, stability and security
                     41: test in advance of them selecting an operating system for their servers
                     42: (which, while using RedHat, had been rooted at least once).  OpenBSD passed
1.6       ian        43: with flying colors and as of today, they're beginning a roll-out of 2.6
1.1       ian        44: onto their servers, mostly using stock components and software from the
                     45: ports tree (qmail, cucipop etc).
                     46:
                     47: <h2>System and Network Administrator Jeff Schneiter offers this:</h2>
                     48: <p> With a frozen budget it sure makes one squeeze every last
                     49: bit of power out of whatever hardware one can lay his hands
                     50: on... and thanks to OpenBSD, I have been doing just that.
                     51:
1.2       ian        52: <h2><a name=sarendal href="mailto:tony@polarcap.org">Tony Sarendal</a> says this:</h2>
1.1       ian        53: <p>I tried OpenBSD because of the IPsec support.
                     54: The reason I stick with it is because it really is nice to use
                     55: and it gives a feeling of quality which no other OS can match.
                     56: <p>
                     57: I did some programming on an OpenBSD machine, after this I really
                     58: appreciated the man pages. Other Unices I used had man pages that
                     59: simply weren't any good.
                     60: <p>
                     61: Keep up the good work guys.
                     62:
                     63: <h2>Security Engineer Tyler Allison writes:</h2>
                     64: <p>
1.6       ian        65: I have installed, secured, and maintained Linux, Windows NT and OpenBSD in
                     66: highly secure environments. (yes you can secure Linux and Windows NT in
1.1       ian        67: this environment :)  ).  Having said that I have to point out that if you
                     68: want a minimum administration to keep up with security issues option you
                     69: need to pick OpenBSD by far.  It is not uncommon for people to go years without
                     70: updating their production OpenBSD machines because they are just rock solid
                     71: and there are no known "remote" vulnerabilities.  Thus no good reason to
                     72: upgrade...
                     73: <p>
                     74: I would feel perfectly happy to have one of my [novice] interns do a basic
                     75: OpenBSD install on a PC (no extra security work after the install) and then put
                     76: the companies crown jewels on that machine and then walk away for a year.
                     77: Knowing full well that machine hasn't crashed, been broken into or in need
                     78: of an OS upgrade.  You can't say that about NT or Linux.
                     79: Or if you do you obviously havent ever used the product that way :)
                     80: <p>
                     81: Another thing that I hear people point out is go check your local exploit
                     82: site or vulnerability alert mailing list and see if you can find a "remote"
                     83: root level exploit that works on OpenBSD. I dare say you won't find any that
                     84: are less than 12 months old.
                     85:
1.2       ian        86: <h2>Jan Johansson gave this reply to a "how do I build a cheap web server?" query:</h2>
1.1       ian        87: <p>
                     88: I work today with Solaris, OpenBSD, NT Server, NT Workstation and Win 95.
                     89: <p>
                     90: After reading Bugtraq for some weeks I will say that I will never put
                     91: any (important) machine on the Internet if there is not a firewall in
                     92: front and for packet filtering I go for OpenBSD...
                     93: <p>
1.6       ian        94: For a cheap web server I say hardware from a known vendor, an ordered
1.1       ian        95: OpenBSD CD-ROM and Apache...
                     96:
                     97:
1.4       ian        98: <h2><a href="mailto:wyodlows@nj.devry.edu">
                     99: William Yodlowsky</a> at Devry Institute wrote:</h2>
1.1       ian       100:
1.4       ian       101: <p>[A few] years ago I was just getting into system administration.  I learned
1.1       ian       102: Linux first.  Then one of our old (I mean *really* old) BSDi servers
                    103: crashed, and it was up to me to rebuild the system.
                    104: <p>
                    105: I looked at FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux.  In the end, it came down
                    106: to "secure and stable" that took the prize.  OpenBSD 2.1 was installed.
                    107: <p>
                    108: Since then, I've run 2.1-2.5 on everything from production servers to
                    109: laptops.  We've never (repeat: NEVER) had a break-in.
                    110: <p>
                    111: A coworker setup a RedHat based box to test his skills at setting up SSL
                    112: and a secure web site.
                    113: It was hacked literally overnight, and by the next morning was attacking
                    114: other sites.
                    115: <p>
                    116: Our OpenBSD servers were probed and then left alone.
                    117: <p>
                    118: In the intervening two years, that original server got upgraded
                    119: and patched several
                    120: times and the OS never gave us reason to question the reliability or
                    121: security of OpenBSD.
                    122: <p>
                    123: We have another box, acting as a router for about 800 workstations doing
                    124: very basic filtering and NAT.  It's on a P120 with 32MB RAM and typically
                    125: the uptime would look like this:
                    126: <pre>
                    127: % uptime
                    128:  9:05PM  up 266 days,  4:23, 1 user, load averages: 0.06, 0.06, 0.06
                    129: %</pre>
                    130: <p>As well, OpenBSD runs on my laptop.
1.6       ian       131: A Gateway Solo 2500 with a Xircom modem, and a Linksys fast Ethernet NIC.
1.1       ian       132: <p>
                    133: And it never crashes :)
                    134: <p>
1.4       ian       135: One other incident that made me a believer... we were pingbombed
                    136: [perhaps a predecessor to the early2000 DDOS attacks?].  I mean,
1.1       ian       137: 900 different hosts on different networks floodpinging an OpenBSD 2.3 box
1.6       ian       138: simultaneously, while it was processing email and web pages for 3500 users.
1.1       ian       139: <p>
                    140: It was a P133 with 64MB ram.  And it didn't go down.  It got a bit slower,
                    141: but never crashed :-)
                    142:
1.3       ian       143: <h2>John J. Adelsberger III said this about us in Bruce Schneier's
1.1       ian       144: <a href="http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0004.html#CommentsfromReaders">
1.2       ian       145: Crypto-Gram</a>:</h2>
                    146: (the comments he is responding to are Schneier's)
1.1       ian       147: <br>
1.6       ian       148: <br>&gt; Real systems show no signs of becoming less
                    149: <br>&gt; complex. In fact, they are becoming more complex,
                    150: <br>&gt; faster and faster. Microsoft Windows is a poster
                    151: <br>&gt; child for this trend to complexity.
1.1       ian       152: <br>
                    153: <br>...
                    154: <br>
1.6       ian       155: <br>&gt; The other choice is to slow down, to simplify,
                    156: <br>&gt; and to try to add security.
1.1       ian       157: <p>
                    158: OpenBSD does this. <I>I am unaware of any other group whose workings
                    159: are publicly viewable that does so</I> [emphasis added], which is regrettable, because
                    160: I would prefer not to have this appear as an OpenBSD plug; rather,
                    161: my purpose is to point out that not only is this approach feasible,
                    162: but it is being done.
                    163:
                    164: <h2>Andrew Hermetz commented as follows:</h2>
                    165: <p>Hey all,
                    166: <p>Just wanted to drop a line and thank all who have worked to make OpenBSD
                    167: such a clean, cool, &amp; efficient project.
                    168: <p>Major kudos to Theo for being a man ahead of his time! ;-)
                    169: <p>As I have to frequently explain to people *why* security is important at
                    170: all ("if you have nothing to hide...", "nothing you do is important enough to
1.6       ian       171: warrant encryption...", "only criminals and terrorists need to sneak around
1.1       ian       172: anonymously...", etc. ad nauseam), let alone *why* it's important in this day
                    173: and age of personal networks behind a DSL or even a full T1, I love being able
1.6       ian       174: to point them to a page which sets out a well-reasoned explanation for taking
1.1       ian       175: computer security seriously.
                    176: <p>[... OpenBSD installed]
                    177: effortlessly onto a Pentium 90 Compaq LTE 5100 laptop -- even the no-name
                    178: brand LAN card came right up and did a kickass install over a friend's office
                    179: T1. When I sing its praises, the thing that seems to get most people is its
                    180: spartan look & feel, but I like knowing where everything is and not having a
                    181: distro that shoves [stuff] into dark corners I'll never find...
                    182: <hr></hr>
                    183: <a href="index.html"><img height=24 width=24 src=back.gif border=0 alt=OpenBSD></a>
                    184: <a href=mailto:www@openbsd.org>www@openbsd.org</a>
1.7     ! ian       185: <br><small>$OpenBSD: testimonials.html,v 1.6 2000/04/21 19:59:23 ian Exp $</small>
1.1       ian       186: </body>
                    187: </html>